Skip Navigation



Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access published online on September 11, 2008

Annals of Occupational Hygiene, doi:10.1093/annhyg/men059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/7/577    most recent
men059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tielemans, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherrie, J. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tielemans, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherrie, J. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Conceptual Model for Assessment of Inhalation Exposure: Defining Modifying Factors

Erik Tielemans1,*, Thomas Schneider2, Henk Goede1, Martin Tischer3, Nick Warren4, Hans Kromhout5, Martie Van Tongeren6, Joop Van Hemmen1 and John W Cherrie6

1 Business Unit Quality and Safety, Department of Food and Chemical Risk Analysis, TNO Quality of Life, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands
2 National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 København Ø, Denmark
3 Division hazardous substances, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Dortmund, Germany
4 Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK
5 Environmental Epidemiology Division, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
6 Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Park North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31-30-694-4990; fax: +31-30-694-4070; e-mail: erik.tielemans{at}tno.nl

The present paper proposes a source–receptor model to schematically describe inhalation exposure to help understand the complex processes leading to inhalation of hazardous substances. The model considers a stepwise transfer of a contaminant from the source to the receptor. The conceptual model is constructed using three components, i.e. (i) the source, (ii) various transmission compartments and (iii) the receptor, and describes the contaminant's emission and its pattern of transport. Based on this conceptual model, a list of nine mutually independent principal modifying factors (MFs) is proposed: activity emission potential, substance emission potential, localized control, separation, segregation, dilution, worker behavior, surface contamination and respiratory protection. These MFs describe the exposure process at a high level of abstraction so that the model can be generically applicable. A list of exposure determinants underlying each of these principal MFs is proposed to describe the exposure process at a more detailed level. The presented conceptual model is developed in conjunction with an activity taxonomy as described in a separate paper. The proposed conceptual model and MFs should be seen as ‘building blocks’ for development of higher tier exposure models.

conceptual model • exposure determinants • inhalation exposure • modifying factors

Received March 11, 2008; in final form July 23, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. Ogden
Data Sharing, Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and the Lions in the Undergrowth
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2009; 53(7): 651 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J J van Hemmen
Reach and the obligations of the chemical industry
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2009; 66(8): 561 - 568.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.