Skip Navigation



Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access published online on June 15, 2006

Annals of Occupational Hygiene, doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel031
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/7/737    most recent
mel031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mamuya, S. H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moen, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mamuya, S. H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moen, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society
Received October 11, 2005
Accepted April 4, 2006

Article

Variability of Exposure and Estimation of Cumulative Exposure in a Manually Operated Coal Mine

Simon H. D. Mamuya 1 *, Magne Bråtveit 2, Julius Mwaiselage 3, and Bente E. Moen 2

1 Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Norway; Section for Occupational Medicine, Department for Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway; Department of Community Health, Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences
2 Section for Occupational Medicine, Department for Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway
3 Cancer Prevention Division, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Simon H. D. Mamuya, E-mail: mamuyasimon{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract

This study aims at estimating variability in exposure to respirable dust and assessing whether the a priori grouping by job team is appropriate for an exposure-response study on respiratory effects among workers in a manually operated coal mine in Tanzania. Furthermore, estimated exposure levels were used to calculate cumulative exposure. Full-shift personal respirable dust samples (n = 204) were collected from 141 randomly chosen workers at underground and surface work sites. The geometric mean exposure for respirable dust varied from 0.07 mg m-3 for office workers to 1.96 mg m-3 for the development team. The analogous range of respirable quartz exposure was 0.006-0.073 mg m-3. Variance components were estimated using random effect models. For most job teams the within-worker variance component was considerably higher than the between-worker variance component. For respirable dust the estimated attenuation of the linear exposure-response relationship was low (5.9%) when grouping by job team. Grouping by job team was considered appropriate for studying the association between current dust exposure and respiratory effects. Based on the estimated worker-specific mean exposure in the job teams, the arithmetic mean cumulative exposure for the 299 workers who participated in the epidemiological part of the study was 38.1 mg • yr m-3 for respirable dust and 2.0 mg • yr m-3 for quartz.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. Samadi, I. M. Wouters, R. Houben, A.-R. Jamshidifard, F. Van Eerdenburg, and D. J. J. Heederik
Exposure to Inhalable Dust, Endotoxins, {beta}(1->3)-Glucans, and Airborne Microorganisms in Horse Stables
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2009; 53(6): 595 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.