Skip Navigation



Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access published online on September 20, 2004

Annals of Occupational Hygiene, doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh054
Copyright © 2004 by the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/7/635    most recent
meh054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roquelaure, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Penneau-Fontbonne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roquelaure, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Penneau-Fontbonne, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received January 19, 2004
Accepted April 5, 2004

Article

Surveillance Program of Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders: Assessment Over a 4 Year Period in a Large Company

Yves Roquelaure 1*, Jean Mariel 2, Corinne Dano 1, Annette Leclerc 3, Stéphanie Moisan 1, and Dominique Penneau-Fontbonne 1

1 Consultation de Pathologie Professionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, F-49033 Angers Cedex, France
2 Service Médical Inter-entreprise de l'Anjou, 25 Rue Carl Linné, F-49009 Angers, France
3 INSERM U 88, 14 Rue du Val d'Osne, F 94415 Saint-Maurice Cedex, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yvroquelaure{at}chu-angers.fr.


   Abstract

Objective: A company-wide surveillance program for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) based on the assessment of health and risk factors was implemented between 1996 and 2000 in a large shoe factory. The study aimed to compare the results of the surveillance program in 1996 and 1997 with the occurrence of MSDs in 2000.

Methods: A health and ergonomic assessment of workstations was performed for 253 workers in 1996. Of these, 166 were examined again in both 1997 and 2000. A set of criteria was used to predict whether or not a job category could be predicted to have a potentially high risk of MSDs in 1996 and 1997 and the results were compared with the incidence rate of MSDs in the job category in 2000.

Results: The criteria based on prevalence data in 1996 were unable to detect the job categories characterized by the occurrence of MSDs in 2000. The criterion based on an incidence rate >1% in 1997 was sensitive and specific. The agreement between the ranking of the job categories according to incidence rate of MSDs in 1997 and 2000 was good ({rho} = 0.57, P = 0.11). Agreement of the prediction based on ergonomic exposure was lower than that based on incidence data.

Conclusion: The efficacy of the surveillance program to predict on a collective basis the job categories in which numerous cases of MSDs occurred in 2000 depended on the decision criteria used. The criteria based on the incidence of MSDs were more reliable to predict the risk of MSDs than those based on prevalence data or on exposure assessment. Because exposure assessment plays a greater role in determining the priorities for ergonomic intervention, surveillance of health and exposure must nevertheless be combined to predict the risk of MSDs in the plant in the short and middle terms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. DESCATHA, Y. ROQUELAURE, B. EVANOFF, J. MARIEL, and A. LECLERC
Predictive Factors for Incident Musculoskeletal Disorders in an In-Plant Surveillance Program
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2007; 51(3): 337 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.