Skip Navigation

Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2007 51(6):543-551; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mem032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LENZUNI, P.
Right arrow Articles by DEL GAUDIO, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LENZUNI, P.
Right arrow Articles by DEL GAUDIO, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Thermal Comfort Assessment in Comfort-Prone Workplaces

PAOLO LENZUNI* and MICHELE DEL GAUDIO

Department of Florence, Italian National Institute for Occupational Prevention and Safety, Via G. LaPira 17, 50121 Firenze, Italy

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 055 289681; fax: +39 055 210882; e-mail: paolo.lenzuni{at}ispesl.it

This paper's main issue is a strong advocacy in favour of an a priori classification of thermal environments that can be really functional to comfort assessment: Class 1, environments where comfort conditions can be established (comfort-prone environments), and Class 2, environments where this is not practically feasible. The former, which are also identified here as ‘thermally unconstrained’ environments, because of the absence of elements preventing comfort from being pursued, are the subject of a novel classification scheme. In assembling such a scheme, the four standardized synthetic indexes (Predicted Mean Vote, Insulation REQuired, Predicted Heat Strain, Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature) have been carefully scrutinized, with special emphasis on the regions of overlap. Additional data from national technical documents and legislation have been used to help in assembling the discomfort assessment scheme. All available information has been reprocessed and cast in a form specific for use in comfort-prone environments. Classification takes place through placement in a four-level and in a six-level discomfort scale for cold and warm environments, respectively; for each area, a recommended descriptor as well as a time frame for intervention are specified. The new scheme also eliminates a few glitches and inconsistencies existing in the ISO 15265 scheme, mostly in the area of cold discomfort. Being solely concerned with comfort-prone environments and keeping an open mind with respect to all available information, the new classification scheme represents a simple and robust all-round tool, tackling issues related to both comfort assessment and to action planning for an optimized allocation of available resources.

Keywords: comfort • risk assessment • thermal environment

Received August 22, 2006; in final form May 31, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. Lenzuni, D. Freda, and M. Del Gaudio
Classification of Thermal Environments for Comfort Assessment
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2009; 53(4): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.