Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2007
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2007 51(4):345-356; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mem019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/4/345    most recent
mem019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GAFFNEY, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by PAUSTENBACH, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GAFFNEY, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by PAUSTENBACH, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

A Proposed Approach for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Sensory Irritants Based on Chemosensory Models

SHANNON H. GAFFNEY* and DENNIS J. PAUSTENBACH

ChemRisk, Inc., 25 Jessie Street, Suite 1800; San Francisco, CA 94105, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: (415) 618-3223; fax: (415) 896-2444; e-mail: sgaffney{at}chemrisk.com

Objectives: Setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for odorous or irritating chemicals is a global occupational health challenge. However, often there is inadequate knowledge about the toxicology of these chemicals to set an OEL and their irritation potencies are usually not recognized until they are manufactured or used in large quantities.

Methods: In this paper, the importance of accounting for risk perception and communication; conditioned responses; and interindividual variability in tolerance, detection and susceptibility with respect to setting an OEL are discussed in relation to three chemosensory models. These parameters and models were then used to construct a flowchart-style methodology that can be used to set an OEL for a specific chemical.

Results: The OEL identified for a chemical odorant or irritant will depend on the type of chemosensory effect that the chemical is likely to exhibit. For example, experience has shown that chemicals with a low odor threshold often require low OELs even though many are not toxic or do not cause irritation at those air concentrations.

Conclusion: In order to establish the appropriate OEL, organizations need to agree upon the percentage of the workforce that they are attempting to protect and the types of toxicological end points that are sufficiently important to protect against (e.g. transient eye irritation, enzyme induction or other reversible effects). This is particularly true for sensory irritants. The method described in this paper could also be extended to setting limits for ambient air contaminants where risk perception plays a dominant role in whether the public views the exposure as being reasonable or safe.

Keywords: occupational exposure limits • odorants • sensory irritants

Received October 23, 2006; in final form February 24, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.