Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on October 10, 2006
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2007 51(1):81-89; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/1/81    most recent
mel066v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HSU, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by BIRKY, B. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HSU, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by BIRKY, B. K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Size-Resolved Sulfuric Acid Mist Concentrations At Phosphate Fertilizer Manufacturing Facilities In Florida

YU-MEI HSU1, CHANG-YU WU1,*, DALE A LUNDGREN1 and BRIAN K BIRKY2

1 University of Florida, Environmental Engineering Sciences Gainesville, FL, USA
2 Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, Bartow FL, USA

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cywu{at}ufl.edu

Strong inorganic acid mists containing sulfuric acid were identified as a ‘known human carcinogen’ in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) report where phosphate fertilizer manufacture was listed as one of many occupational exposures to strong acids. To properly assess the occupational exposure to sulfuric acid mists in modern facilities, approved National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7903 and a cascade impactor were used for measuring the total sulfuric acid mist concentration and size-resolved sulfuric acid mist concentration, respectively. Sampling was conducted at eight phosphate fertilizer plants and two background sites in Florida and there were 24 sampling sites in these plants. Samples were analyzed by ion chromatography (IC) to quantify the water-soluble ion species. The highest sulfuric acid concentrations by the cascade impactor were obtained at the sulfuric acid pump tank area. When high aerosol mass concentrations (100 µg m–3) were observed at this area, the sulfuric acid mists were in the coarse mode. The geometric mean sulfuric acid concentrations (±geometric standard deviation) of PM23 (aerodynamic cut size smaller than 23 µm), PM10 and PM2.5 from the cascade impactor were 41.7 (±5.5), 37.9 (±5.8) and 22.1 (±4.5) µg m–3, respectively. The geometric mean (±geometric standard deviation) for total sulfuric acid concentration from the NIOSH method samples was 143 (±5.08) µg m–3. Sulfuric acid mist concentrations varied significantly among the plants and even at the same location. The measurements by the NIOSH method were 1.5–229 times higher than those by the cascade impactor. Moreover, using the NIOSH method, the sulfuric acid concentrations measured at the lower flow rate (0.30 Lpm) were higher than those at the higher flow rate (0.45 Lpm). One possible reason for the significant differences between the results from the cascade impactor and the NIOSH method is the potential artifact resulting from the interaction of SO2 with silica gel and glass fiber used in the NIOSH method.

Keywords: sulfuric acid mist • phosphate fertilizer facilities • NIOSH method 7903 • cascade impactor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.