Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2006
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(8):765-775; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/8/765    most recent
mel040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FEVOTTE, J.
Right arrow Articles by BERGERET, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FEVOTTE, J.
Right arrow Articles by BERGERET, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Case–Control Study on Renal Cell Cancer and Occupational Exposure to Trichloroethylene. Part I: Exposure Assessment

JOËLLE FEVOTTE1, BARBARA CHARBOTEL1,*, PHILIPPE MULLER-BEAUTÉ2, JEAN-LOUIS MARTIN1, MARTINE HOURS1 and ALAIN BERGERET1

1 Epidemiological Research and Surveillance Unit in Transport, Occupation and Environment, (UMRESTTE, UMR T n°. 9002 - Joint INRETS/UCLB/InVS unit) Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8, avenue Rockefeller, F-69373 Lyon Cedex 08, France
2 Association des Services Médicaux Interprofessionnels Circonscription de Cluses (ASMICC) (Local occupational physicians team) 131 rue de l'industrie 74950 Scionzier France

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 4 78772827; fax: +33 4 78742582; e-mail: barbara.charbotel{at}rockefeller.univ-lyon1.fr

A method for a semi-quantitative retrospective assessment of exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE) was implemented for a case–control study conducted in the Arve valley (France), an area with a widely developed screw-cutting industry, where teams of occupational physicians have collected a large quantity of well-documented measurements. A task-exposure matrix was developed to link the main working circumstances in a screw-cutting workshop to corresponding TCE-exposure levels: a ‘basic level’ was assigned to each task, standing for usual working procedures; exposure circumstances, such as duration or distance from the TCE source, were introduced as corrective factors. In parallel, a detailed occupational questionnaire was designed, setting subjects' descriptions of their successive jobs and working circumstances against levels assessed in the matrix. Possible exposure to TCE, plus some other occupational compounds (other solvents, oils, some metals, asbestos, welding fumes and ionizing radiations), were assessed for any job in all job histories. An average level of exposure to TCE, related to an 8 h usual working day, was attributed to each job period in turn, which was then categorized into six classes: 0; 1–35; 35–50; 50–75; 75–100; and >100 p.p.m. A total of 402 study subjects described their occupational life (average 3.7 jobs/subject, from 1924 to 2003). About 19% of the 1486 job periods described were assessed as being exposed to TCE; of these, 72.2% involved levels <35 p.p.m., 13.2% involved levels >50 p.p.m. and 5.4% above the French occupational exposure limit of 75 p.p.m. (TWA 8 h). A total of 41 job periods included exposure with peaks. Compared with levels encountered in other studies, the more severely exposed part of our study population seemed more exposed than most other populations previously studied, owing to vapor degreasing practices.

Keywords: cancer epidemiology • cutting fluid • exposure assessment • solvents • trichloroethylene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.