Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on February 2, 2006
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(3):323-329; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei074
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/3/323    most recent
mei074v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAMWELL, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by CORNS, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RAMWELL, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by CORNS, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Crown Copyright 2006. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Transferability of Six Pesticides from Agricultural Sprayer Surfaces

CARMEL T. RAMWELL1,*, PAUL D. JOHNSON2 and HELEN CORNS2

1 Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK; 2 Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44(0)1904 462485; fax: +44(0)1904 462111; e-mail: c.ramwell{at}csl.gov.uk

Secondary exposure to pesticide residues on the external surfaces of sprayers does not currently form part of the risk assessment process. A measure of the ease with which residues may be transferred from the sprayer surface to the operator would enhance the accuracy of any such assessment. This study quantified the dislodgeability of six pesticides from sprayer surfaces in order to calculate the transfer efficiencies. The transfer efficiency was compound dependent, ranging from 80% for azoxystrobin to <25% for flusilazole and tebuconazole. When the washed and unwashed surfaces were analysed separately, more pendimethalin and isoproturon residues were removed from the wet surface compared with the dry surface. The variation in results for the different compounds highlights the need to consider a range of compounds to form generic statements to support guidelines regarding operator exposure to pesticide residues on sprayers.

Keywords: agricultural sprayers • dermal transfer • pesticides


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.