Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(3):259-269; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/3/259    most recent
mei058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BALAZY, A.
Right arrow Articles by GRINSHPUN, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BALAZY, A.
Right arrow Articles by GRINSHPUN, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Manikin-Based Performance Evaluation of N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Nanoparticles

ANNA BALAZY1,2, MIKA TOIVOLA1, TIINA REPONEN1, ALBERT PODGÓRSKI2, ANTHONY ZIMMER3 and SERGEY A. GRINSHPUN1,*

1 Department of Environmental Health, Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA; 2 Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland; 3 Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1-513-558-0504; fax: +1-513-558-2263; e-mail: sergey.grinshpun{at}uc.edu

Protection of the human respiratory system from exposure to nanoparticles is becoming an emerging issue in occupational hygiene. The potential adverse health effects associated with particles of ~1–100 nm are probably greater than submicron or micron-sized particles. The performance of two models of N95 half-facepiece-filtering respirators against nano-sized particles was evaluated at two inhalation flow rates, 30 and 85 l min–1, following a manikin-based protocol. The aerosol concentration was measured outside and inside the facepiece using the Wide-Range Particle Spectrometer. Sodium chloride particles, conventionally used to certify N-series respirators under NIOSH 42 CFR 84 regulations, were utilized as the challenge aerosol. The targeted particle sizes ranged from 10 to 600 nm, although the standard certification tests are performed with particles of ~300 nm, which is assumed to be the most penetrating size. The results indicate that the nanoparticle penetration through a face-sealed N95 respirator may be in excess of the 5% threshold, particularly at high respiratory flow rates. Thus, N95 respirators may not always provide the expected respiratory protection for workers. The highest penetration values representing the poorest respirator protection conditions were observed in the particle diameter range of ~30–70 nm. Based on the theoretical simulation, we have concluded that for respirators utilizing mechanical filters, the peak penetration indeed occurs at the particle diameter of ~300 nm; however, for pre-charged fiber filters, which are commonly used for N95 respirators, the peak shifts toward nano-sizes. This study has confirmed that the neutralization of particles is a crucial element in evaluating the efficiency of a respirator. The variability of the respirator's performance was determined for both models and both flow rates. The analysis revealed that the coefficient of variation of the penetration ranged from 0.10 to 0.54 for particles of 20–100 nm in diameter. The fraction of N95 respirators for which the performance test at 85 l min–1 demonstrated excessive (>5%) penetration of nanoparticles was as high as 9/10. The test results obtained in a relatively small (0.096 m3) test chamber and in a large (24.3 m3) walk-in chamber were found essentially the same, thus, suggesting that laboratory-based evaluations have a good potential to adequately represent the respirator field performance.

Keywords: aerosol filtration • electret filter • N95 respirator • penetration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. J. Cho, T. Reponen, R. Mckay, R. Shukla, H. Haruta, P. Sekar, and S. A. Grinshpun
Large Particle Penetration through N95 Respirator Filters and Facepiece Leaks with Cyclic Flow
Ann. Hyg., August 21, 2009; (2009) mep062v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. Rengasamy, B. C. Eimer, and R. E. Shaffer
Comparison of Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-Marked Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2009; 53(2): 117 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. Demou, P. Peter, and S. Hellweg
Exposure to Manufactured Nanostructured Particles in an Industrial Pilot Plant
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2008; 52(8): 695 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
R. M. Eninger, T. Honda, A. Adhikari, H. Heinonen-Tanski, T. Reponen, and S. A. Grinshpun
Filter Performance of N99 and N95 Facepiece Respirators Against Viruses and Ultrafine Particles
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2008; 52(5): 385 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S.-A. Lee, S. A. Grinshpun, and T. Reponen
Respiratory Performance Offered by N95 Respirators and Surgical Masks: Human Subject Evaluation with NaCl Aerosol Representing Bacterial and Viral Particle Size Range
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2008; 52(3): 177 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.