Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(2):157-173; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/2/157    most recent
mei048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANTHONY, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by FLYNN, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ANTHONY, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by FLYNN, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

CFD Model for a 3-D Inhaling Mannequin: Verification and Validation

T. RENEE ANTHONY1,* and MICHAEL R. FLYNN2

1 Environmental and Community Health, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0468, USA; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 520 8825852; fax: +1 520 882 5014; e-mail: tra{at}email.arizona.edu

This work investigates the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to model air flow and particle transport associated with an inhaling anatomical mannequin. The studied condition is typically representative of occupational velocities (Re = 1920) and at-rest breathing (R = Uo/Um = 0.11). Methods to verify and validate CFD simulations are detailed to demonstrate convergence and describe the model's uncertainties. The standard k-epsilon model provided a reasonable flow field, although vertical velocity components were consistently smaller than the experimental validation data, owing to truncation of the computational model at hip height. Laminar particle trajectory studies indicated that the modeled velocity field resulted in a shift of particle aspiration fractions toward particles smaller than those determined experimentally, consistent with the vertical velocity field differences.

Keywords: inhalable particles • modeling computational fluid dynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.