Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(1):29-38; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/1/29    most recent
mei038v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DARNTON, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DARNTON, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Estimating the Number of Asbestos-related Lung Cancer Deaths in Great Britain from 1980 to 2000

ANDREW J. DARNTON*, DAMIEN M. McELVENNY and JOHN T. HODGSON

Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Health and Safety Executive, Magdalen House, Trinity Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 3QZ, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44-151-951-3095; fax: +44-151-951-4703; e-mail: andrew.darnton{at}hse.gsi.gov.uk

Introduction: Inhalation of asbestos fibres is known to cause two main kinds of cancer—mesothelioma and lung cancer. While the vast majority of mesothelioma cases are generally accepted as being caused by asbestos, the proportion of asbestos-related lung cancers is less clear and cannot be determined directly because cases are not clinically distinguishable from those due to other causes. The aim of this study was to estimate the number of asbestos-related lung cancers among males by modelling their relative lung cancer mortality among occupations within Great Britain in terms of smoking habits, mesothelioma mortality (as an index of asbestos exposure) and occupation type (as a proxy for socio-economic factors).

Methods: Proportional mortality ratios for lung cancer and mesothelioma for the 20-year period from 1980 to 2000 (excluding 1981) were calculated for occupational groups. Smoking indicators were developed from three General Household Surveys carried out during the 1980s and 1990s. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the number of asbestos-related lung cancers by estimating the number of lung cancer deaths in each occupation assuming no asbestos exposure and subtracting this from the actual predicted number of lung cancer deaths.

Results: The effect of asbestos exposure in predicting lung cancer mortality was weak in comparison to smoking habits and occupation type. The proportion of current smokers in occupational groups and average age at which they started smoking were particularly important factors. Our estimate of the number of asbestos-related lung cancers was between two-thirds and one death for every mesothelioma death: equivalent to between 11 500 and 16 500 deaths during the time period studied.

Conclusions: Asbestos-related lung cancer is likely to have accounted for 2–3% of all lung cancer deaths among males in Great Britain over the last two decades of the 20th century. Asbestos-related lung cancers are likely to remain an important component of the total number of lung cancer deaths in the future as part of the legacy of past asbestos exposures in occupational settings.

Keywords: asbestos • lung cancer • mesothelioma • mortality • smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A-H Harding, A Darnton, J Wegerdt, and D McElvenny
Mortality among British asbestos workers undergoing regular medical examinations (1971-2005)
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2009; 66(7): 487 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Rushton, S Hutchings, and T Brown
The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2008; 65(12): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Hansell
Airborne Environmental Exposure to Asbestos
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2008; 178(6): 556 - 557.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B W Case
Asbestos, smoking, and lung cancer: interaction and attribution.
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2006; 63(8): 507 - 508.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. GREENBERG
Estimating the Number of Asbestos-Related Cancer Deaths in Great Britain
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 107 - 107.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.