Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on February 16, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(7):563-568; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/7/563    most recent
mei003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KUO, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, C.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KUO, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, C.-W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Evaluation of Exhalation Valves

YU-MEI KUO1, CHANE-YU LAI2, CHIH-CHIEH CHEN3,*, BO-HONG LU3, SHENG-HSIU HUANG4 and CHUN-WAN CHEN4

1 Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa College of Medical Technology, 89, Wen-Hwa 1st Street, Jen-Te Hsiang, Tainan Hsien, Taiwan 717; 2 Department of Occupational Safety and Hygiene, Chung Shan Medical University, 110, Section 1, Kan-Ko N. Road, Taichung, Taiwan 402; 3 Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 1, Section 1, Ren-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan 100; 4 Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Council of Labor Affairs, 99, Lane 407, Hengke Road, Sijhih City, Taipei County, Taiwan 221

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +886 2 2393 8631; fax: +886 2 2321 5741; e-mail: ccchen{at}ntu.edu.tw

Certification tests currently employed by some industrialized nations to certify respirators require that when challenged with air flow at a constant suction head of 25 mmH2O, the leakage into the facepiece from the exhalation valve(s) should not exceed 30 ml min–1. However, the test alone might not reflect the leakage rate under different levels of vacuum. To study the characteristics of leakage through exhalation valves, a leakage meter was built to measure the leakage rate of four brands of exhalation valves. Seven valves of each brand were tested for leakage rate at pressure drops ranging from 15 to 45 mmH2O (or extended to 75 mmH2O for some valves). Two types of leaks, i.e. fiber insertion and arch dent on the valve seat, were used to investigate the effect of leak shape on the characteristic leak flow as a function of pressure drop. A leakage data point represented a mean value of five measurements. The results showed that the leakage rate could increase or decrease with increasing pressure drop inside the respirators, indicating that the current method of conducting leakage tests, at a constant suction head of 25 mmH2O, does not guarantee better protection than when the respirators are used at a lower suction head. Moreover, based on the sample valves tested in this study, it was found that valve leakage was mostly caused by defects in the valve seats. Both fiber-insertion and arch-dent leaks had either increasing or decreasing characteristic curves, depending on the size of the leak and the material of the valve membrane.

Keywords: exhalation valves • leakage rate • pressure drop


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. CLAYTON and N. VAUGHAN
Fit for purpose? The role of fit testing in respiratory protection
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2005; 49(7): 545 - 548.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.