Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on June 17, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(6):529-533; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/6/529    most recent
mei025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ERIKSSON, K.
Right arrow Articles by LAMPA, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ERIKSSON, K.
Right arrow Articles by LAMPA, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Should Styrene be Sampled on the Left or Right Shoulder?—An Important Question in Employee Self-Assessment

KÅRE ERIKSSON1,*, INGRID LILJELIND2, JESSICA FAHLÉN3 and ERIK LAMPA2

1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden; 2 The Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; 3 Department of Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, SE 901 87 Umeå, Sweden

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +46 90 785 25 52; fax: +46 90 785 24 56; e-mail: Kare.Eriksson{at}envmed.umu.se

A self-operated personal sampling technique called ‘self assessment of exposure’ (SAE) has been suggested as an easy method for collecting inhalation exposure data, as the workers themselves are performing the sampling. Employers and employees have raised the question of whether a different estimate of the air concentration is likely to be obtained depending on whether the sampler is fastened at the left or the right shoulder. In order to answer this question, the exposure to styrene vapour in two different small enterprises within the reinforced plastics industry was measured. Seven workers participated and the air sampling was performed by diffusive sampling. We observed no statistically significant difference in the determined air concentration of styrene between the left and right shoulder (P = 0.878). The results strongly indicate that the fastening of a sampler on the left or right shoulder does not produce a difference in the estimation of the inhalation exposure. SAE can thus be used to collect reliable exposure data of styrene vapour. The reliability of SAE will most certainly inspire occupational hygienists, physicians and other experts to involve the workers in repeated exposure measurements. Taking the exposure variability into account, repeated measurements are crucial when evaluating acute and chronic health effects following inhalation exposure to gases and vapours from chemical hazards.

Keywords: breathing zone • diffusive sampling • inhalation • occupational exposure monitoring • reinforced plastics industry • styrene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. Meijster, E. Tielemans, J. Schinkel, and D. Heederik
Evaluation of Peak Exposures in the Dutch Flour Processing Industry: Implications for Intervention Strategies
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 587 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. HERTSENBERG, D. BROUWER, M. LURVINK, C. RUBINGH, E. RIJNDERS, and E. TIELEMANS
Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents Among Shoe Repair Men
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.