Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HINES, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by HULL, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HINES, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by HULL, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 503-517, 2003
© 2003 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Biological Monitoring for Selected Herbicide Biomarkers in the Urine of Exposed Custom Applicators: Application of Mixed-effect Models

CYNTHIA J. HINES1,*, JAMES A. DEDDENS1,2, CYNTHIA A. F. STRILEY1, RAYMOND E. BIAGINI1, DALE A. SHOEMAKER1, KENNETH K. BROWN1, BARBARA A. MACKENZIE1 and R. DELON HULL1

1 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Pkwy, Cincinnati, OH, 45226, USA; 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA

Received 28 February 2002; in final form 26 February 2003

Metabolites and/or parent compounds of the herbicides atrazine, alachlor, metolachlor, cyanazine and the 2-ethylhexyl ester of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) were measured in the urine of 15 custom applicators who each provided from five to seven 24 h urine samples during a 6 week period (n = 87). Each applicator provided a pre-season urine sample and a reference population (n = 46) provided first-morning urine samples. Urinary biomarkers were measured by either immunoassay or gas chromatography. During the spraying season, the geometric mean amount of alachlor mercapturate equivalents (eq.), atrazine eq., 2,4-D and metolachlor mercapturate eq. excreted in 24 h was 17, 19, 110 and 22 nmol, respectively. Mixed-effect models were used to determine predictors of the amount of atrazine eq. and 2,4-D excreted in 24 h. The specific days of herbicide spraying associated with increased biomarker excretion varied for the two analytes, and included one or more days prior to urine collection. This confirms the importance of collecting covariate information on day(s) most relevant to the biomarker of interest. The within-worker variance component, expressed as a geometric standard deviation (WGSD range: 2.5–2.9), was substantially larger than the between-worker component (BGSD range: 1.3–1.5) for the modeled biomarkers. Alachlor mercapturate eq. and metolachlor mercapturate eq. were detected in more than half of the applicator pre-season urine samples. All biomarkers were detected infrequently in the reference population. Evaluation of non-spray exposure determinants was limited by inclusion of prior day spraying, adjustment for time and the small sample size.

Keywords: atrazine; alachlor; metolachlor; 2,4-D; cyanazine; biological monitoring; mixed-effect models; variance components; immunoassays


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
B. D. CURWIN, M. J. HEIN, W. T. SANDERSON, C. STRILEY, D. HEEDERIK, H. KROMHOUT, S. J. REYNOLDS, and M. C. ALAVANJA
Urinary Pesticide Concentrations Among Children, Mothers and Fathers Living in Farm and Non-Farm Households in Iowa
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 53 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.