Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 337, 2003
© 2003 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Letters to the Editor

The Comfort and Effectiveness of Hearing Protection Devices

JOHN EDWARDS

Corus plc, Swinden Technology Centre, Moorgate, Rotherham S60 3AR, UK

Received 19 November 2002;

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The article by Arezes and Miguel (2002) is valuable in quantifying an important issue—hearing protection will be less effective if it is less comfortable, because it will be tend to be worn for shorter periods of time. Unfortunately, the conclusions drawn are misleading in that they . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. M. AREZES and A. S. MIGUEL
Reply
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2003; 47(4): 338 - 338.
[Full Text] [PDF]