Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OESTENSTAD, K.
Right arrow Articles by BRILL, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OESTENSTAD, K.
Right arrow Articles by BRILL, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 587-596, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Assessment of Historical Exposures to Talc at a Mining and Milling Facility

KENT OESTENSTAD1,*, YASUSHI HONDA2, ELIZABETH DELZELL3 and ILENE BRILL3

1 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA; 2 Environmental Health Sciences Program, Institute of Health and Sport Sciences , University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan; 3 Department of Epidemiology and International Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA

Received 15 August 2001; in final form 24 June 2002

The purpose of this study was to develop an estimate of exposure to respirable dust for all job categories and all years in a retrospective follow-up study of worker mortality in a talc mining and milling facility. All jobs were assigned to work areas that were considered to have similar exposure profiles. Uniform exposure time periods during which non-random, deterministic variables were thought to be constant were identified and an experienced rater assigned categorical exposure scores to each work area/time period. These scores and measured baseline respirable dust concentrations were used to calculate the estimated job area/year concentrations for each work area/time period. Estimates were compared to available historical measurements. The estimated exposures ranged from 1.7 to 0.1 mg/m3 and displayed a decreasing trend over time. When compared with measured exposures, the estimated exposures had a correlation coefficient of 0.55 with an average difference of 0.01 mg/m3 and a range of 0.60 to –0.48 mg/m3. The estimates were considered to be acceptable for determining relative ranking of subjects according to cumulative exposure.

Keywords: exposure estimation; occupational exposure; talc


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Creely, H. Cowie, M. Van Tongeren, H. Kromhout, J. Tickner, and J. W. Cherrie
Trends in Inhalation Exposure A Review of the Data in the Published Scientific Literature
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2007; 51(8): 665 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
E. B. Ilgren
The Biology of Cleavage Fragments: A Brief Synthesis and Analysis of Current Knowledge
Indoor and Built Environment, October 1, 2004; 13(5): 343 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
Y. HONDA, C. BEALL, E. DELZELL, K. OESTENSTAD, I. BRILL, and R. MATTHEWS
Mortality among Workers at a Talc Mining and Milling Facility
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2002; 46(7): 575 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.