Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TIELEMANS, E.
Right arrow Articles by VAN HEMMEN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TIELEMANS, E.
Right arrow Articles by VAN HEMMEN, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 287-297, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

A Proposal for Evaluation of Exposure Data

ERIK TIELEMANS*, HANS MARQUART, JOHAN DE COCK, MONIQUE GROENEWOLD and JOOP VAN HEMMEN

Department of Chemical Exposure Assessment, TNO Chemistry, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands

Received 24 September 2001; in final form 2 January 2002

There is a growing need for transparency concerning ways in which existing exposure data are weighted for their relative value and quality. Currently, this evaluation is largely subjective and is dependent on the quality of the judgement of the individual assessor or expert group. In this paper some general guidelines are presented for a quality assessment procedure. Such a pre-determined procedure potentially enhances the consistency among different assessors and assessments and facilitates harmonization of assessment procedures. The guidelines are presented in the context of a decision tree with four decision rules for data quality, i.e. ‘availability of occupational hygiene information’, ‘variability and precision issues’, ‘internal validity’ and ‘external validity’. These methodological issues are considered to be the most important aspects of data quality and will be discussed in this paper. The decision tree eventually results in three quality classes, i.e. exposure data providing sufficient information, supplementary information and data which should be excluded from the exposure assessment process. The guidelines should not be used in a rigid manner but have to be interpreted in the light of the particular circumstances and purposes of the assessment.

Keywords: decision tree; exposure assessment; exposure data; quality evaluation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Galea, M. Van Tongeren, A. J. Sleeuwenhoek, D. While, M. Graham, A. Bolton, H. Kromhout, and J. W. Cherrie
Trends in Wood Dust Inhalation Exposure in the UK, 1985-2005
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2009; 53(7): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. Tielemans, T. Schneider, H. Goede, M. Tischer, N. Warren, H. Kromhout, M. Van Tongeren, J. Van Hemmen, and J. W Cherrie
Conceptual Model for Assessment of Inhalation Exposure: Defining Modifying Factors
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 577 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. Tielemans, D. Noy, J. Schinkel, H. Heussen, D. Van Der Schaaf, J. West, and W. Fransman
Stoffenmanager Exposure Model: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 443 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. SCARSELLI, C. MONTARULI, and A. MARINACCIO
The Italian Information System on Occupational Exposure to Carcinogens (SIREP): Structure, Contents and Future Perspectives
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2007; 51(5): 471 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. LAVOUE, D. BEGIN, C. BEAUDRY, and M. GERIN
Monte Carlo Simulation to Reconstruct Formaldehyde Exposure Levels from Summary Parameters Reported in the Literature
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2007; 51(2): 161 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H. MARQUART, N. D. WARREN, J. LAITINEN, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Default Values for Assessment of Potential Dermal Exposure of the Hands to Industrial Chemicals in the Scope of Regulatory Risk Assessments
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 469 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
G M. Swaen
A framework for using epidemiological data for risk assessment
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2006; 25(3): 147 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
G. SMOLIANSKIENE
Quality of Exposure Data
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2003; 47(5): 427 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. BURDORF and M. V. TONGEREN
Commentary: Variability in Workplace Exposures and the Design of Efficient Measurement and Control Strategies
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2003; 47(2): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. H. VINCENT and M. A. WERNER
Critical Evaluation of Historical Occupational Aerosol Exposure Records: Applications to Nickel and Lead
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 49 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. TIELEMANS, Y. CHRISTOPHER, H. MARQUART, M. GROENEWOLD, and J. VAN HEMMEN
Excluding Exposure Data of Very Poor Quality Is a Core Principle for Regulatory Risk Assessment
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2002; 46(6): 559 - 560.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
C. D. MONEY
European Chemical Regulation and Occupational Hygiene
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2002; 46(3): 275 - 277.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.