Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BORM, P. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by TRAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BORM, P. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by TRAN, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 25-32, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press


Article

From Quartz Hazard to Quartz Risk: the Coal Mines Revisited

PAUL J. A. BORM1,* and LANG TRAN2

1Department of Fibre & Particle Toxicology, Medical Institute for Environmental Hygiene, Auf ’m Hennekamp 50, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; 2Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK

Received 23 June 2000; in final form 21 March 2001.

Following the classification of quartz as a human carcinogen by the IARC, many standard-setting committees are currently trying to convert this hazard into their national or EU standards. Since human data to set a safe exposure limit for quartz are limited, we hypothesized that lung burden data on quartz in coal miners’ lungs after lifetime exposure could be used to set a non-carcinogenic lung burden of quartz, and that this might be valid for other groups occupationally exposed to quartz. A review of data shows that lungs of coal miners with simple coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (sCWP) typically contain up to 30 g of dust, and in one specific study lung burdens between 0.7 and 1.7 g of quartz were associated with macules only, and no sCWP. Assuming independent actions of coal and quartz and no clearance of quartz, and sCWP as a prerequisite for lung cancer due to quartz exposure in coal mine dust, a simple kinetic approach was applied. A no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for quartz of between 0.03 and 0.13 mg/m3 (40 yr exposure) is derived, but it is concluded that more refined physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling is needed for a better estimate, also including interindividual differences in lung clearance. Considering the independent effects of, and the well-known interaction between coal and quartz, these data could be important to other workplaces with usual mixed-dust exposure.

Keywords: quartz; coal; lung burden; risk assessment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
X. Huang, T. Gordon, W. N. Rom, and R. B. Finkelman
Interaction of Iron and Calcium Minerals in Coals and their Roles in Coal Dust-Induced Health and Environmental Problems
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 64(1): 153 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
C. Albrecht, R. P. F. Schins, D. Hohr, A. Becker, T. Shi, A. M. Knaapen, and P. J. A. Borm
Inflammatory Time Course after Quartz Instillation: Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Particle Surface
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., September 1, 2004; 31(3): 292 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.