Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Methner, M.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Methner, M.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 615-633, 2000
© 2000 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Hazard surveillance for industrial magnetic fields: II. Field characteristics from waveform measurements

J.D. Bowman and M.M. Methner

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Mail Stop C-27), 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA

Tel.: +1-513-533-8143; fax: +1-513-533-8510

Received 12 April, 1999; Revised 19 January, 2000.

Magnetic field characteristics have been surveyed systematically in six factories with the Multiwave® II waveform capture instrument. These six facilities manufactured plastics, pharmaceuticals, cement, liquid air products, aluminum parts, and aluminum-framed filters. The study goals were to survey the physical characteristics of magnetic fields that may be related to biological effects under various interaction mechanisms and to relate those characteristics to the field's sources. From 59 waveform measurements at worker locations near sources, we calculated the extremely low frequency (ELF) and static field magnitudes, their frequency characteristics, and spatial characteristics of the 60Hz component. The RMS vector magnitude of the ELF magnetic field (the usual exposure metric in most studies) had medians ranging from 0.53 to 12.83µT in the six factories. The static magnetic field magnitudes had medians of 24.2–46.2µT, which is well below the geomagnetic reference field of 55.0µT because of shielding from steel structures. The maximum static field was 128.6µT near a DC motor. The frequency spectra of the most common fields is dominated by 60Hz, and has a median total harmonic distortion equal to 14.8%. The most common higher frequencies are the third, fifth, and second harmonics of 60Hz. However, magnetic fields in these workplaces had many other 60Hz harmonics and non-harmonic frequencies due particularly to electric motors and computer monitors. The 60Hz component magnetic fields have elliptical polarization with median axial ratio of 25.4%. The average proportion of the 60Hz component parallel to the static field vector was 51.5±3.0%, which indicates a significant trend towards perpendicular orientation between these two field components. In this survey of only six factories, the Multiwave® II measurements documented a wide diversity of complex magnetic field characteristics and non-sinusoidal waveforms. Although these characteristics are important to the various mechanisms postulated to explain biological effects, they are overlooked by the popular exposure assessment methods which only measure the ELF magnitude. Therefore, spot measurements with the Multiwave® II or similar waveform capture instruments are necessary for a complete magnetic field exposure assessment.

EMF; extremely low frequency; ELF; exposure assessment; waveform; cancer; neurodegenerative diseases


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Kheifets, J D Bowman, H Checkoway, M Feychting, J M Harrington, R Kavet, G Marsh, G Mezei, D C Renew, and E van Wijngaarden
Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2009; 66(2): 72 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.