Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DELFT, J. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAAN, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VAN DELFT, J. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAAN, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 105-114, 1998
© 1998 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press


research-article

Monitoring of Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in a Carbon-electrode Manufacturing Plant

JOOST H. M. VAN DELFT*,{dagger}, MARIE-JOSÉ STEENWINKEL*, JEFF G. VAN ASTEN*, JACQUES VAN ES{dagger}, AART KRAAK§ and ROBERT A. BAAN*

*TNO Nutrition and Food Research Instutute, Taxicology Division, Department of Molecular Toxicology P.O. Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeisi, The Netherlands
{dagger} Aluminium & Chemie Rotterdam B.V., Oude Maasweg 80, 3197 KJ Botlek-Rotterdam, The Netherlands
§ ArboNed Utrecht, P.O. Box 2400, 3500 GK Utrecht, The Netherlands

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel:+31 30 6944438, Fax: +31 30 6960264. e-mail: vandelft{at}voeding.tno.nl

An investigation is presented of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in a carbon-electrode manufacturing plant, as assessed by three monitoring methods, viz. environmental monitoring of the external dose by analysis of personal air samples, biological monitoring of the internal dose by analysis of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHpyrene), and biological effect monitoring by dosimetry of PAH-DNA adducts in blood lymphocytes. On the basis of job conditions, workers at the plant were divided into three groups with presumed low, intermediate and high exposure to air-borne PAH, respectively. All air samples showed levels of total PAH below the current MAC-value in the Netherlands, which is 200µg/m3, whereas the benzo[a]pyrene level was occasionally higher than the recommended concentration of 2 µg/m3 The values of 1-OHpyrene in urine from the intermediate and high exposure groups were significantly higher than those of the low exposure group, namely 3.6- and 8.2-fold, respectively. Clear external and internal exposure was thus demonstrated for workers of the high and intermediate exposure groups, but this did not result in a measurable effect at the DNA level in blood lymphocytes. Tobacco smoking, on the other hand, caused a significant increase of the levels of PAH-DNA adducts but did not affect 1 -OHpyrene values. These data suggest that smoking is a more important risk factor for adverse health effects, i.e. cancer, than occupational exposure to PAH in this plant. © 1998 British Occupational Hygiene Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

biological monitoring • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon • DNA adducts • 1-hydroxypyrene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
D F Merlo, S Garattini, U Gelatti, C Simonati, L Covolo, M Ceppi, and F Donato
A mortality cohort study among workers in a graphite electrode production plant in Italy
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2004; 61(2): e9 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J P Arnould, A Pfohl-Leszkowicz, V Bach, J P Libert, and J Belegaud
Biological monitoring exposure of workers from plant producing carbon electrodes: quantification of benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in leukocytes, by a 32P-postlabelling method and an immunoassay
Human and Experimental Toxicology, May 1, 1999; 18(5): 314 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.