Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2009
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2009 53(2):184-189; doi:10.1093/annhyg/men088
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Reply
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Before responding to their letter, we first wish to thank Dr Conolly and his coauthors for their assistance in making our analysis possible. This assistance included making their data and computer code fully available to us. We also would like to compliment them for their work on the formaldehyde model. This model involved many years of research and included both development of the underlying data and innovative modeling of these data. We believe it is unique in the way it brings together in one modeling framework a very rich database. This work is valuable in demonstrating how data from diverse studies can be combined in a single model and in understanding the potential uses and limitations of such modeling efforts.
Conolly et al. state in the outset of their letter that they want to focus on technical issues and not on cancer risk per se. However, the formaldehyde model
Louisiana Tech University, PO Box 10348, Ruston, LA 71272-0046, USA
National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 8623D, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, USA
ENVIRON International Corporation, 1900 North, 18th Street, Suite 804, Monroe, LA 71201, USA
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ogden Data Sharing, Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and the Lions in the Undergrowth Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2009; 53(7): 651 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
