Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2006
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(6):642-644; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/6/642    most recent
mel044v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MONEY, C.
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MONEY, C.
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Evaluation of the Utility and Reliability of COSHH Essentials

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health) Essentials was developed with the intention of providing practical, reliable advice to users of chemicals, especially those without access to developed occupational hygiene skills. At the forefront of the development was the recognition that traditional forms of exposure control advice are neither accessible . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CHRIS MONEY1,*, STEVE BAILEY2, MARK SMITH3, ALISTAIR HAY4, BUD HUDSPITH5, DAVID TOLLEY6, JOHN DOBBIE7 and HEATHER JACKSON8

1 ExxonMobil Petroleum and Chemical Machelen, Belgium
2 GlaxoSmithKline Worthing, UK
3 Bayer CropScience Norwich, UK
4 University of Leeds Leeds, UK
5 Amicus London, UK
6 London Borough of Tower Hamlets London, UK
7 Innovene Sunbury, UK
8 Sypol Aylesbury, UK

*E-mail: chris.money@exxonmobil.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. G. Lee, M. Harper, R. B. Bowen, and J. Slaven
Evaluation of COSHH Essentials: Methylene Chloride, Isopropanol, and Acetone Exposures in a Small Printing Plant
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2009; 53(5): 463 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. Tischer, S. Bredendiek-KAmper, U. Poppek, and R. Packroff
How Safe is Control Banding? Integrated Evaluation by Comparing OELs with Measurement Data and Using Monte Carlo Simulation
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2009; 53(5): 449 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. Tielemans, D. Noy, J. Schinkel, H. Heussen, D. Van Der Schaaf, J. West, and W. Fransman
Stoffenmanager Exposure Model: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 443 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]