Skip Navigation



Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access published online on August 21, 2009

Annals of Occupational Hygiene, doi:10.1093/annhyg/mep062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grinshpun, S. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grinshpun, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Large Particle Penetration through N95 Respirator Filters and Facepiece Leaks with Cyclic Flow

Kyungmin Jacob Cho1, Tiina Reponen1,*, Roy Mckay1, Rakesh Shukla2, Hiroki Haruta3, Padmini Sekar2 and Sergey A. Grinshpun1

1 Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
2 Center for Biostatistical Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
3 Koken Ltd., 7, Yonbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8459, Japan

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +513-558-0571; fax: +513-558-2263; e-mail: tiina.reponen{at}uc.edu

The aim of this study was to investigate respirator filter and faceseal penetration of particles representing bacterial and fungal spore size ranges (0.7–4 µm). First, field experiments were conducted to determine workplace protection factors (WPFs) for a typical N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR). These data (average WPF = 515) were then used to position the FFR on a manikin to simulate realistic donning conditions for laboratory experiments. Filter penetration was also measured after the FFR was fully sealed on the manikin face. This value was deducted from the total penetration (obtained from tests with the partially sealed FFR) to determine the faceseal penetration. All manikin experiments were repeated using three sinusoidal breathing flow patterns corresponding to mean inspiratory flow rates of 15, 30, and 85 l min–1. The faceseal penetration varied from 0.1 to 1.1% and decreased with increasing particle size (P < 0.001) and breathing rate (P < 0.001). The fractions of aerosols penetrating through the faceseal leakage varied from 0.66 to 0.94. In conclusion, even for a well-fitting FFR respirator, most particle penetration occurs through faceseal leakage, which varies with breathing flow rate and particle size.

cyclic flow • faceseal • filter • penetration • protection factor • respirator

Received March 12, 2009; in final form July 24, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.