Skip Navigation

Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2009 53(3):271-288; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mep005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, D.
Right arrow Articles by Coble, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, D.
Right arrow Articles by Coble, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Determinants of Exposure to Metalworking Fluid Aerosols: A Literature Review and Analysis of Reported Measurements

Donguk Park1,2,*, Patrica A. Stewart3 and Joseph B. Coble1

1 Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 6120 Executive Boulevard. EPS Room 8005, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
2 Deptartment Of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University, 169, Dongsungdong, Jongroku, Seoul 110-791, Korea
3 Stewart Exposure Assessments, LLC, 6045 North 27th Street, Arlington, VA 22207, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: pdw545{at}knou.ac.kr

An extensive literature review of published metalworking fluid (MWF) aerosol measurement data was conducted to identify the major determinants that may affect exposure to aerosol fractions (total or inhalable, thoracic and respirable) and mass median diameters (MMDs). The identification of determinants was conducted through published studies and analysis of published measurement levels. For the latter, weighted arithmetic means (WAMs) by number of measurements were calculated and compared using analysis of variance and t-tests. The literature review found that the major factors affecting aerosol exposure levels were, primarily, decade, type of industry, operation and fluid and engineering control measures. Our analysis of total aerosol levels found a significant decline in measured levels from an average of 5.36 mg m–3 prior to the 1970s and 2.52 mg m–3 in the 1970s to 1.21 mg m–3 in the 1980s, 0.50 mg m–3 in the 1990s and 0.55 mg m–3 in the 2000s. Significant declines from the 1990s to the 2000s also were found in thoracic fraction levels (0.48 versus 0.40 mg m–3), but not for the respirable fraction. The WAMs for the auto (1.47 mg m–3) and auto parts manufacturing industry (1.83 mg m–3) were significantly higher than that for small-job machine shops (0.68 mg m–3). In addition, a significant difference in the thoracic WAM was found between the automotive industry (0.46 mg m–3) and small-job machine shops (0.32 mg m–3). Operation type, in particular, grinding, was a significant factor affecting the total aerosol fraction [grinding operations (1.75 mg m–3) versus other machining (0.95 mg m–3)], but the levels associated with these operations were not statistically different for either the thoracic or the respirable fractions. Across all decades, the total aerosol fraction for straight oils (1.49 mg m–3) was higher than for other fluid types (soluble = 1.08 mg m–3, synthetic = 0.52 mg m–3 and semisynthetic = 0.50 mg m–3). Fluid type was also found to be partly associated with differences in the respirable fraction level. We found that the total aerosols were measured by a variety of sampling media, devices and analytical methods. This diversity of approaches makes interpretation of the study results difficult. In conclusion, both the literature review and the measurement data analyzed found that decade and type of industry, operation and fluid were important determinants of total aerosol exposure. Industry type and fluid type were associated with differences in exposure to the thoracic and respirable fraction levels, respectively.

Keywords: enclosure • grinding operation • machining operation • mass median diameters (MMDs) • metalworking aerosol fraction • metalworking fluids (MWFs)

Received August 5, 2008; in final form January 9, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.