Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2009
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2009 53(3):249-263; doi:10.1093/annhyg/men083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/3/249    most recent
men083v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamoorthy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamoorthy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Model-Based Imputation Approach for Data Analysis in the Presence of Non-detects

K. Krishnamoorthy1,*, Avishek Mallick1 and Thomas Mathew2

1 Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA
2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +337-482-5283; fax: +337-482-5346; e-mail: krishna{at}louisiana.edu

A model-based multiple imputation approach for analyzing sample data with non-detects is proposed. The imputation approach involves randomly generating observations below the detection limit using the detected sample values and then analyzing the data using complete sample techniques, along with suitable adjustments to account for the imputation. The method is described for the normal case and is illustrated for making inferences for constructing prediction limits, tolerance limits, for setting an upper bound for an exceedance probability and for interval estimation of a log-normal mean. Two imputation approaches are investigated in the paper: one uses approximate maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the parameters and a second approach uses simple ad hoc estimates that were developed for the specific purpose of imputations. The accuracy of the approaches is verified using Monte Carlo simulation. Simulation studies show that both approaches are very satisfactory for small to moderately large sample sizes, but only the MLE-based approach is satisfactory for large sample sizes. The MLE-based approach can be calibrated to perform very well for large samples. Applicability of the method to the log-normal distribution and the gamma distribution (via a cube root transformation) is outlined. Simulation studies also show that the imputation approach works well for constructing tolerance limits and prediction limits for a gamma distribution. The approach is illustrated using a few practical examples.

Keywords: confidence interval • exceedance probability • left-censored data • prediction limits • quantiles • tolerance limits • Wilson–Hilferty approximation

Received June 19, 2008; in final form November 24, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.