Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2008
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2008 52(7):645-651; doi:10.1093/annhyg/men037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/7/645    most recent
men037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galiotte, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Figaro Gattás, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galiotte, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Figaro Gattás, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Assessment of Occupational Genotoxic Risk among Brazilian Hairdressers

Maíra Precivalle Galiotte1, Priscila Kohler1, Gisele Mussi2 and Gilka J. Figaro Gattás1,*

1 Department of Legal Medicine, Ethics and Occupational Health, São Paulo University Medical School, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05405-000, Brazil
2 Occupational Health Service, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University Medical School, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05405-000, Brazil

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Instituto Oscar Freire, Rua Teodoro Sampaio, 115, São Paulo, SP CEP: 05405-000, Brazil. Tel/fax: +55-11-3085-9677; e-mail: gfgattas{at}usp.br

Objectives: To evaluate the genotoxic risk to hairdressers exposed daily to chemical substances such as hair dyes, waving and straightening preparations and manicurists' products by the Comet assay test (single-cell gel electrophoresis).

Methods: The Comet assay was performed on blood samples from 69 female hairdressers (36.4 ± 10.7 years old) currently employed in 21 different beauty institutes in São Paulo, Brazil, and on 55 female control blood donors (32.6 ± 10.0 years old) from the São Paulo University Clinical Hospital blood bank. All the control subjects had occupations other than hairdresser. Comet assays were performed by evaluating 100 blood lymphocytes per individual and graded by visual score according to comet tail length.

Results: The hairdressers showed a higher frequency of DNA damage revealed by Comet Score (159.8 ± 71) when compared to the control group (125.4 ± 64.1), and the difference was statistically significant by the Student's t-test (P = 0.005). Multiple regression analysis showed that in addition to the hairdressers' profession, tobacco use contributed to the higher frequency of cells with comets (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The observed DNA damage could be associated with the hairdressers' occupational environment, where different chemicals are chronically manipulated and inhaled. Considering that this profession in many countries, including Brazil, is not officially regulated, more attention should focus on these professionals not only by legislative bodies but also by multidisciplinary teams able to develop and implement risk prevention and control strategies for chemical, physical and biological agents to which hairdressers are exposed.

Keywords: Comet assay • DNA damage • hairdressers • occupational health

Received March 1, 2008; in final form April 23, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
R. J. Preston, J. A. Skare, and M. J. Aardema
A review of biomonitoring studies measuring genotoxicity in humans exposed to hair dyes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2010; 25(1): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.