Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on May 13, 2008
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2008 52(5):385-396; doi:10.1093/annhyg/men019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/5/385    most recent
men019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eninger, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinshpun, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eninger, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinshpun, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Filter Performance of N99 and N95 Facepiece Respirators Against Viruses and Ultrafine Particles

Robert M. Eninger1, Takeshi Honda1, Atin Adhikari1, Helvi Heinonen-Tanski2, Tiina Reponen1 and Sergey A. Grinshpun1,*

1 Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2 Department of Environmental Science, University of Kuopio, Finland

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1-513-558-0504; fax: +1-513-558-2263; e-mail: sergey.grinshpun{at}uc.edu

The performance of three filtering facepiece respirators (two models of N99 and one N95) challenged with an inert aerosol (NaCl) and three virus aerosols (enterobacteriophages MS2 and T4 and Bacillus subtilis phage)—all with significant ultrafine components—was examined using a manikin-based protocol with respirators sealed on manikins. Three inhalation flow rates, 30, 85, and 150 l min–1, were tested. The filter penetration and the quality factor were determined. Between-respirator and within-respirator comparisons of penetration values were performed. At the most penetrating particle size (MPPS), >3% of MS2 virions penetrated through filters of both N99 models at an inhalation flow rate of 85 l min–1. Inhalation airflow had a significant effect upon particle penetration through the tested respirator filters. The filter quality factor was found suitable for making relative performance comparisons. The MPPS for challenge aerosols was <0.1 µm in electrical mobility diameter for all tested respirators. Mean particle penetration (by count) was significantly increased when the size fraction of <0.1 µm was included as compared to particles >0.1 µm. The filtration performance of the N95 respirator approached that of the two models of N99 over the range of particle sizes tested (~0.02 to 0.5 µm). Filter penetration of the tested biological aerosols did not exceed that of inert NaCl aerosol. The results suggest that inert NaCl aerosols may generally be appropriate for modeling filter penetration of similarly sized virions.

Keywords: filter • penetration • respirator • ultrafine • virus

Received October 25, 2007; in final form March 17, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. J. Cho, T. Reponen, R. Mckay, R. Shukla, H. Haruta, P. Sekar, and S. A. Grinshpun
Large Particle Penetration through N95 Respirator Filters and Facepiece Leaks with Cyclic Flow
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2010; 54(1): 68 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. Rengasamy, B. C. Eimer, and R. E. Shaffer
Comparison of Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-Marked Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2009; 53(2): 117 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.