Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on May 2, 2008
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2008 52(4):287-295; doi:10.1093/annhyg/men016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/4/287    most recent
men016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, O.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© Crown Copyright 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society

Performance of Laboratories Analysing Welding Fume on Filter Samples: Results from the WASP Proficiency Testing Scheme

Peter Stacey* and Owen Butler

The Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 (0) 114 2892645; fax: +44 (0) 114 2892544; e-mail: peter.stacey{at}hsl.gov.uk

This paper emphasizes the need for occupational hygiene professionals to require evidence of the quality of welding fume data from analytical laboratories. The measurement of metals in welding fume using atomic spectrometric techniques is a complex analysis often requiring specialist digestion procedures. The results from a trial programme testing the proficiency of laboratories in the Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) to measure potentially harmful metals in several different types of welding fume showed that most laboratories underestimated the mass of analyte on the filters. The average recovery was 70–80% of the target value and >20% of reported recoveries for some of the more difficult welding fume matrices were <50%. This level of under-reporting has significant implications for any health or hygiene studies of the exposure of welders to toxic metals for the types of fumes included in this study. Good laboratories' performance measuring spiked WASP filter samples containing soluble metal salts did not guarantee good performance when measuring the more complex welding fume trial filter samples. Consistent rather than erratic error predominated, suggesting that the main analytical factor contributing to the differences between the target values and results was the effectiveness of the sample preparation procedures used by participating laboratories. It is concluded that, with practice and regular participation in WASP, performance can improve over time.

Keywords: air sampling • analysis • fume • proficiency testing • quality of data • WASP • welding

Received December 14, 2007; in final form March 13, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.