Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2007
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2007 51(7):571-580; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mem044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
51/7/571    most recent
mem044v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semple, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semple, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2007 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Bar Workers' Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke: The Effect of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Occupational Exposure

Sean Semple1,2,*, Laura Maccalman2, Audrey Atherton Naji1, Scott Dempsey2, Shona Hilton1,3, Brian G. Miller2 and Jon G. Ayres1

1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Liberty Safe Work Research Centre, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZP, UK
2 Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
3 MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lillybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44(0)1224 558188; fax: +44(0)1224 551826; e-mail: sean.semple{at}abdn.ac.uk

Objectives: To examine changes in bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) over a 12-month period before and after the introduction of Scottish smoke-free legislation on the 26 March 2006.

Methods: A total of 371 bar workers were recruited from 72 bars in three cities: Aberdeen, Glasgow, Edinburgh and small towns in two rural regions (Borders and Aberdeenshire). Prior to the introduction of the smoke-free legislation, we visited all participants in their place of work and collected saliva samples, for the measurement of cotinine, together with details on work patterns, self-reported exposure to SHS at work and non-work settings and smoking history. This was repeated 2 months post-legislation and again in the spring of 2007. In addition, we gathered full-shift personal exposure data from a small number of Aberdeen bar workers using a personal aerosol monitor for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at the baseline and 2 months post-legislation visits.

Results: Data were available for 371 participants at baseline, 266 (72%) at 2 months post-legislation and 191 (51%) at the 1-year follow-up. The salivary cotinine level recorded in non-smokers fell from a geometric mean of 2.94 ng ml–1 prior to introduction of the legislation to 0.41 ng ml–1 at 1-year follow-up. Paired data showed a reduction in non-smokers' cotinine levels of 89% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85–92%]. For the whole cohort, the duration of workplace exposure to SHS within the last 7 days fell from 28.5 to 0.83 h, though some bar workers continued to report substantial SHS exposures at work despite the legislation. Smokers also demonstrated reductions in their salivary cotinine levels of 12% (95% CI 3–20%). This may reflect both the reduction in SHS exposure at work and falls in active cigarette smoking in this group. In a small sub-sample of bar workers, full-shift personal exposure to PM2.5, a marker of SHS concentrations, showed average reductions of 86% between baseline and 2 months after implementation of the legislation.

Conclusions: Most bar workers have experienced very large reductions in their workplace exposure to SHS as a result of smoke-free legislation in Scotland. These reductions have been sustained over a period of 1 year.

Keywords: cotinine • particulate matter • second-hand smoke

Received July 23, 2007; in final form August 12, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
E. Brennan, M. Cameron, C. Warne, S. Durkin, R. Borland, M. J. Travers, A. Hyland, and M. A. Wakefield
Secondhand smoke drift: Examining the influence of indoor smoking bans on indoor and outdoor air quality at pubs and bars
Nicotine Tob Res, January 22, 2010; (2010): ntp204v1 - ntp204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
S Semple, A Naji, S Haw, and J G Ayres
Care-home workers' exposure to SHS: a short summary of findings
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2009; 66(9): 639 - 640.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
J. M. Martinez-Sanchez, E. Fernandez, M. Fu, M. Perez-Rios, M. J. Lopez, C. Ariza, J. A. Pascual, A. Schiaffino, R. Perez-Ortuno, E. Salto, et al.
Impact of the Spanish smoking law in smoker hospitality workers
Nicotine Tob Res, September 1, 2009; 11(9): 1099 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J G Ayres, S Semple, L MacCalman, S Dempsey, S Hilton, J F Hurley, B G Miller, A Naji, and M Petticrew
Bar workers' health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2009; 66(5): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.