Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on March 21, 2006
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(4):395-403; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
50/4/395    most recent
mel010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UNWIN, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHAMBERS, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by UNWIN, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHAMBERS, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Crown Copyright 2006. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office


Original Article

An Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the UK

JOHN UNWIN, JOHN COCKER*, EMMA SCOBBIE and HELEN CHAMBERS

Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44-1298-218429; fax: +44-1298-218172; E-mail: john.cocker{at}hsl.gov.uk

A cross-industry occupational hygiene survey was commissioned by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to determine the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure in UK industry and to determine if one or more target analytes were suitable as markers for assessing total exposure to PAHs. There were no broadly applicable UK exposure standards for assessing total exposure to PAHs. Until 1993 a guidance value for assessing exposure in coke ovens only, where PAH exposure is known to be the highest, was based on gravimetric analysis of cyclohexane-soluble material. Biological monitoring based on urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) is widely reported to be an effective indicator of exposure by both dermal and inhalation routes but there was no UK guidance value. The survey involved an occupational hygiene study of 25 sites using both airborne monitoring of a total of 17 individual PAHs and biological monitoring. The results showed 8 h TWA levels of total PAH in air ranged from 0.4 to 1912.6 µg m–3 with a GM of 15.8 µg m–3. The profile of PAHs was dominated by naphthalene, the most volatile 2-ring PAH. Airborne benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) correlated well (r2 = 0.971) with levels of carcinogenic 4–6 ring PAHs and was an effective marker of exposure for all industries where significant particle bound PAH levels were found and, in particular, for CTPV exposure. The 8 h TWA levels of BaP ranged from <0.01 to 6.21 µg m–3 with a GM of 0.036 µg m–3; 90% were <0.75 µg m–3 and 95% were <2.0 µg m–3. Two hundred and eighteen urine samples collected from different workers at the end of shift and 213 samples collected pre-shift next day were analysed for 1-OHP. Levels of 1-OHP in end-of-shift samples were generally higher than those in pre-shift-next-day samples and showed a good correlation (r2 = 0.768) to airborne BaP levels if samples from workers using respiratory protection or with significant dermal exposure were excluded. Urinary 1-OHP in end-of-shift samples ranged from the limit of detection (0.5 µmol mol–1 creatinine) to 60 µmol mol–1 creatinine with a mean of 2.49 µmol mol–1 and a 90th percentile value of 6.7 µmol mol–1 creatinine. The highest 1-OHP levels were found in samples from workers impregnating timber with creosote where exposure was dominated by naphthalene. If the 11 samples from these workers were excluded from the dataset, the 90% value for end-of-shift urine samples was 4 µmol mol–1 creatinine (n = 207) and this value has since been adopted by the HSE as a biological monitoring benchmark value.

Keywords: benzo(a)pyrene • biological monitoring • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons • urinary 1-hydroxypyrene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Rushton, S Hutchings, and T Brown
The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2008; 65(12): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B G Armstrong and A Darnton
Estimating reduction in occupational disease burden following reduction in exposure
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2008; 65(9): 592 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. S. Robinson, T. R. Anthony, S. R. Littau, P. Herckes, X. Nelson, G. S. Poplin, and J. L. Burgess
Occupational PAH Exposures during Prescribed Pile Burns
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 497 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. Aries, D. R. Anderson, and R. Fisher
Exposure Assessment of Workers to Airborne PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs at an Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Plant in the UK
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2008; 52(4): 213 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. W. Cherrie, M. Van Tongeren, and S. Semple
Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens in Great Britain
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2007; 51(8): 653 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.