Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(3):219-229; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei059
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Article |
Workplace Protection of Air-Fed Visors Used in Paint Spraying Operations
1 Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK and 2 Health and Safety Executive, Bootle L20 3QZ, UK
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 (0)1298 218 329; fax: +44 (0)1294 218 393; e-mail: nick.vaughan{at}hsl.gov.uk
Air-fed visors are commonly used for protection against exposure to airborne isocyanates during paint spraying. Protection levels for this class of equipment are theoretically adequate, yet isocyanate sensitization in this occupation still occurs. The work reported here set out to establish the level of respiratory protection that is achieved during real paint spraying activities when air-fed visors are used. The work also examined the effects of reduced air supply flow rates on this type of respiratory protection. The workplace study highlighted common problems that occur when attempting to measure protection factors, and process and interpret the collected data. Many of the environments included in this study did not exhibit challenge concentrations high enough to reliably measure the workplace protection factor of this class of device. When detection limits are taken into consideration, the remaining field data suggest that an assigned protection factor in the region of 40 may be appropriate. When well maintained and used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, air-fed visors are capable of providing a good level of respiratory protection. The protection given by air-fed visors is strongly dependent on the air flow supplied to them. Laboratory measurements demonstrate that protection falls as the air supply falls. This is a gradual process and does not suddenly occur at any particular air supply flow. Observations made during the field tests indicate that there may be other activities associated with the spraying process that need to be taken into consideration when looking for sources of respiratory sensitization.
Keywords: workplace protection factor • assigned protection factor • air fed visor • paint spraying • isocyanate