Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2006 50(1):75-83; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/1/75    most recent
mei027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ARAGÓN, A.
Right arrow Articles by WESSELING, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ARAGÓN, A.
Right arrow Articles by WESSELING, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Assessment of Dermal Pesticide Exposure with Fluorescent Tracer: A Modification of a Visual Scoring System for Developing Countries

AURORA ARAGÓN1,2,*, LUIS E. BLANCO1,2, AURA FUNEZ1, CLEMENS RUEPERT3, CAROLA LIDÉN2,4, GUN NISE2 and CATHARINA WESSELING2,3

1 Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Occupational and Environmental Health Program, Faculty of Medicine, UNAN-León, Nicaragua; 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 3 Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica; 4 Department of Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Sweden

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +505 3115612; fax: +505 3114970; e-mail: aragon{at}unanleon.edu.ni, aurora_aragon{at}yahoo.com

A semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment method based on visual observations of fluorescence images was presented by Fenske in 1988. We adapted the method to Nicaraguan working conditions and evaluated its performance. Thirty-two farmers applied chlorpyrifos and methamidophos marked with Tinopal CBS-X®. Skin fluorescent depositions were observed with a portable UV lamp in a foldaway darkened room. We modified the two components of the original system—extent by weighting the size of exposed body parts according to total body surface and intensity by establishing criteria for reading the fluorescence images. This resulted in body segment scores (BSSs) for specific body parts as well as two summary measures, contaminated body area (CBA) as the percentage of contaminated skin in relation to total body surface and total visual score (TVS) as an overall score combining extent and intensity of contamination. The scoring of intensity was evaluated with quantitative chemical residue analyses. Hands were the most frequently contaminated, and the back had the highest BSS. The CBA ranged between 1 and 66% and the TVS between 0.5 and 270. The farmer with the highest TVS scored 60% of the maximum possible. Residues increased with increasing fluorescence intensities with some misclassification. Fluorescent images reflected work practices and contamination mechanisms. In conclusion, the visual score, as modified by us, provides information on the body segments most contributing to dermal exposure and degree of skin contamination during pesticide applications. Fluorescence patterns reflect exposure routes. The system is low-cost and practical for developing countries. Further improvements are recommended.

Keywords: dermal exposure • developing country • exposure assessment • fluorescent tracer • methods • Nicaragua • pesticides


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
L. E. Blanco, A. Aragon, I. Lundberg, C. Wesseling, and G. Nise
The Determinants of Dermal Exposure Ranking Method (DERM): A Pesticide Exposure Assessment Approach for Developing Countries
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 535 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
K. Culp, R. Kuye, K. J. Donham, R. Rautiainen, M. Umbarger-Mackey, and S. Marquez
Agricultural-Related Injury and Illness in The Gambia: A Descriptive Survey of a Rural Nursing Service and Area Farmers
Clin Nurs Res, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 170 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. SPEE
Occupational Hygiene in Africa
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 431 - 435.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.