Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on March 29, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(6):493-502; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press
Original Article |
Alternative Metrics for Noise Exposure Among Construction Workers
1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7234, USA; 2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1-206-685-7189; fax: +1-206-543-9616; e-mail: nseixas{at}u.washington.edu
Although the exposure–response relationships for noise-induced hearing loss are relatively well established, there is not complete agreement on which metrics of noise exposure best represent risk of hearing damage. In particular, while Leq, based on a 3 dB exchange rate (ER) is used by most agencies, US OSHA's standard is based on the Lavg, which uses a 5 dB ER. In addition, peak levels of exposure, which are commonly found in some industries, including construction, are believed to increase risk above that predicted by the Leq. This paper presents an analysis of a large database of noise exposures among construction workers, comparing several noise metrics, and their application to a cohort of construction workers. Metrics examined were the Lavg, Leq and Lmax, expressing average levels of exposure across an exposure interval. Two novel metrics were derived from these monitored metrics, Leq/Lavg and Lmax/Leq, as measures of exposure variability and ‘peakiness’, respectively. A total of 730 workshifts, including data on 361 492 min of exposure to workers in nine trades were examined. Correlations between average metrics (Leq, Lavg and Lmax) are generally very high, while the variability metrics are poorly correlated with either average levels, or with each other, indicating that they characterize different aspects of exposure. Alternative models for estimating exposure for the cohort were considered and the use of a task-within-trade specific mean level was adopted. The task-specific estimates of exposure using the various metrics will be applied to the cohort's work history to explore the importance of these alternative metrics in estimating risk of noise-induced damage.
Keywords: noise • exposure assessment • occupational noise exposure • exposure metrics • construction workers
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Edelson, R. Neitzel, H. Meischke, W. Daniell, L. Sheppard, B. Stover, and N. Seixas Predictors of Hearing Protection Use in Construction Workers Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2009; 53(6): 605 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Virji, S. R. Woskie, M. Waters, S. Brueck, D. Stancescu, R. Gore, C. Estill, and M. Prince Agreement between Task-Based Estimates of the Full-Shift Noise Exposure and the Full-Shift Noise Dosimetry Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2009; 53(3): 201 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Neitzel, W. Daniell, L. Sheppard, H. Davies, and N. Seixas Comparison of Perceived and Quantitative Measures of Occupational Noise Exposure Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2009; 53(1): 41 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. OGDEN Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|