Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on March 24, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(6):461-472; doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/6/461    most recent
mei012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEXT, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by THOMPSON, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HEXT, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by THOMPSON, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press


Original Article

Titanium Dioxide: Inhalation Toxicology and Epidemiology

PAUL M. HEXT1,*, JOHN A. TOMENSON2 and PETER THOMPSON3

1 Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TJ, UK; 2 ICI Group Headquarters North West Group Safety, Security, Health and Environment, PO Box 13, The Heath Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 4QF, UK; 3 Environmental Management Services, Bushey Flatt Farm, Newlandside, Stanhope, Co Durham DL13 2PP, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1625 514559; fax: +44 1625 590249; e-mail: paul.hext{at}syngenta.com

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is manufactured worldwide in large quantities for use in a wide range of applications and is normally considered to be toxicologically inert. Findings of tumours in the lungs of rats exposed chronically to high concentrations of TiO2, but not in similarly exposed mice or hamsters, suggest that the tumorigenic response may be a rat-specific phenomenon but nonetheless raises concerns for potential human health effects. With the limited toxicological understanding of species differences in response to inhaled TiO2 and a similarly limited amount of epidemiological information with respect to TiO2 exposure in the workplace, a consortium of TiO2 manufacturers in Europe (under the European Chemistry Industry Council; CEFIC) and in North America (under the American Chemistry Council; ACC) initiated a programme of research to investigate inter-species differences as a result of exposure to TiO2 and to conduct detailed epidemiological surveys of the major manufacturing sites. The toxicology studies exposed rats, mice and hamsters to pigment-grade TiO2 (PG-TiO2, 0, 10, 50 and 250 mg m–3) or ultrafine TiO2 (UF-TiO2, 0, 0.5, 2 and 10 mg m–3) for 90 days and the lung burdens and tissue responses were evaluated at the end of the exposure period and for up to 1 year after exposure. Results demonstrated clear species differences. Rats and mice had similar lung burdens and clearance rates while hamsters showed high clearance rates. At high lung particle burdens, rats showed a marked progression of histopathological lesions throughout the post-exposure period while mice and hamsters showed minimal initial lesions with recovery apparent during the post-exposure period. Lung neutrophil responses, a sensitive marker of inflammatory changes, reflected the development or recovery of the histopathological lesions. The use of surface area rather than gravimetric lung burden provided closer correlates of the burden to the biological effect across both TiO2 types. The epidemiological investigations evaluated the mortality statistics at 11 European and 4 US TiO2 manufacturing plants. They concluded that there was no suggestion of any carcinogenic effect associated with workplace exposure to TiO2.

Keywords: epidemiology • inhalation • titanium dioxide • toxicology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. Yokohira, T. Kuno, K. Yamakawa, K. Hosokawa, Y. Matsuda, N. Hashimoto, S. Suzuki, K. Saoo, and K. Imaida
Lung Toxicity of 16 Fine Particles on Intratracheal Instillation in a Bioassay Model Using F344 Male Rats
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2008; 36(4): 620 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
P E Schwarze, J Ovrevik, M Lag, M Refsnes, P Nafstad, R B Hetland, and E Dybing
Particulate matter properties and health effects: consistency of epidemiological and toxicological studies
Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 2006; 25(10): 559 - 579.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. HEXT, J. TOMENSON, and P. THOMPSON
Reply
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2006; 50(2): 207 - 208.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
I. IAVICOLI and G. CARELLI
The Assessment of Titanium Dioxide Exposure
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2006; 50(2): 205 - 205.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.