Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on January 13, 2005
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(4):351-358; doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/4/351    most recent
meh095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHISHOLM, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHISHOLM, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Crown Copyright 2005. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Published by Oxford University Press;


Original Article

Comparison of Quartz Standards for X-ray Diffraction Analysis: HSE A9950 (Sikron F600) and NIST SRM 1878

JIM CHISHOLM*

Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK

* Tel: 01298 218555; fax: 01298 218571; e-mail: jim.chisholm{at}hsl.gov.uk

ABSTRACT

A further comparison of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) standard quartz, A9950 (Sikron F600), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1878, standard respirable {alpha}-quartz, has been carried out for the four principal diffraction peaks. In the earlier comparison by Jeyaratnam and Nagar (1993, Ann Occup Hyg; 37: 167–79), the standards were both treated in ways which might change the particle size distribution and therefore the proportion of crystalline quartz. The two standards have now been compared in the most direct way possible with the minimum of sample treatment. There are no significant differences in the diffraction peak positions for the two standards. Nor do the peak area intensities differ significantly. The peak height intensities are consistently and significantly higher for Sikron F600 than for NIST SRM 1878. The particle size broadening of the diffraction peaks is evidently greater for NIST 1878, whose mass median diameter is quoted as 1.6 µm against 2.6 µm for Sikron F600. Taking the certified reference value for SRM 1878 as 95.5 ± 1.1% crystalline quartz, the HSE standard A9950 (Sikron F600) contains 96.3 ± 1.4% crystalline quartz based on a comparison of peak area intensities. On the same basis but using peak height intensities, the nominal crystalline quartz content of A9950 (Sikron F600) is 101.2 ± 1.8%. Results obtained by comparison of quartz standards may not be generally applicable because of the effect of sample treatment on particle size and crystalline quartz content.

Keywords: crystalline silica • quartz • X-ray diffraction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. Stacey, E. Kauffer, J.-C. Moulut, C. Dion, M. Beauparlant, P. Fernandez, R. Key-Schwartz, B. Friede, and D. Wake
An International Comparison of the Crystallinity of Calibration Materials for the Analysis of Respirable {alpha}-Quartz Using X-Ray Diffraction and a Comparison with Results from the Infrared KBr Disc Method
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2009; 53(6): 639 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
D. K. VERMA and D. S. SHAW
Comparison of Crystalline Silica ({alpha}-Quartz) Calibration Standards NIST-SRM 1878 and NIST-SRM 1878a by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometry
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2005; 49(4): 359 - 361.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.