Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on December 13, 2004
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(2):135-145; doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh069
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press;
Evaluation and Further Development of EASE Model 2.0
1 Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK; 2 Private consultant, 7 Daneway, Ainsdale, Southport, UK; 3 Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK; 4 Artificial Intelligence Application Institute, Edinburgh University, UK; 5 Exxon Mobil Petroleum and Chemical, Belgium; 6 Health and Safety Executive, Bootle, UK
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 870 850 5131; fax: +44 870 850 5132; e-mail: karen.creely{at}iomhq.org.uk
EASE (Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure) is a general model that may be used to predict workplace exposure to a wide range of substances hazardous to health. First developed in the early 1990s, it is now in its second Windows version. This paper provides a critical assessment of the utility and performance of the EASE model, and on the basis of this review, recommendations for the structure of a revised model are outlined. Twenty-seven stakeholders were interviewed about their previous use of EASE, perceived advantages and limitations of the model and suggestions for improvement. A subset of stakeholders was contacted on a second occasion to determine their views on the preferred outputs for an ideal exposure assessment model. Overall, stakeholders felt that the model should be updated to provide more accurate and precise exposure assessments. However, users also expressed the view that the simplicity and usability of the software model should not be compromised. Six studies investigating the validity of the inhalation exposure assessment section of EASE were identified. These showed that the model generally either predicted close to the measured exposures or overestimated exposure; though performance was highly variable. Two studies investigated the validity of the dermal exposure assessment and found that EASE produced considerable overestimates of actual dermal exposure (the amount of a substance that actually lands on the skin). A conceptual model of exposure was developed to investigate whether the structure of the EASE model is appropriate. Although EASE has a number of characteristics that describe exposure, it is a greatly simplified model and does not include all the important exposure determinants. More importantly, EASE can produce estimates of exposure that are ambiguous or incomplete. Our conceptual model may provide a rational basis for developing an improved version of EASE but further consultation is needed to decide the purpose and intended use of any successor to EASE.
Keywords: chemical • EASE • exposure assessment • model
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Schinkel, W. Fransman, H. Heussen, H. Kromhout, H. Marquart, and E. Tielemans Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2010; 67(2): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Cherrie and S. Semple Dermal Exposure to Metalworking Fluids and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin (MCCP) Ann. Hyg., December 3, 2009; (2009) mep081v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M Rappaport Assessing workplace exposures: turning to the past for guidance Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2009; 66(7): 429 - 430. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Tielemans, T. Schneider, H. Goede, M. Tischer, N. Warren, H. Kromhout, M. Van Tongeren, J. Van Hemmen, and J. W Cherrie Conceptual Model for Assessment of Inhalation Exposure: Defining Modifying Factors Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 577 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Marquart, H. Heussen, M. Le Feber, D. Noy, E. Tielemans, J. Schinkel, J. West, and D. Van Der Schaaf 'Stoffenmanager', a Web-Based Control Banding Tool Using an Exposure Process Model Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 429 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Tielemans, D. Noy, J. Schinkel, H. Heussen, D. Van Der Schaaf, J. West, and W. Fransman Stoffenmanager Exposure Model: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 443 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Boogaard Biomonitoring as a tool in the human health risk characterization of dermal exposure Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2008; 27(4): 297 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. NORTHAGE EASEing into the Future Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2005; 49(2): 99 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. TICKNER, J. FRIAR, K. S. CREELY, J. W. CHERRIE, D. E. PRYDE, and J. KINGSTON The Development of the EASE Model Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2005; 49(2): 103 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. CHERRIE and G. W. HUGHSON The Validity of the EASE Expert System for Inhalation Exposures Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2005; 49(2): 125 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|