Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on December 15, 2004
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2005 49(1):17-24; doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/1/17    most recent
meh084v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLANCO, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by NISE, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLANCO, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by NISE, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society Published by Oxford University Press;

Determinants of Dermal Exposure among Nicaraguan Subsistence Farmers during Pesticide Applications with Backpack Sprayers

LUIS E. BLANCO1,2,*, AURORA ARAGÓN1,2, INGVAR LUNDBERG2,3, CAROLA LIDÉN4, CATHARINA WESSELING2,5 and GUN NISE2

1 Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNAN-León, León, Nicaragua; 2 Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 3 National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden; 4 Department of Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; 5 Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 505 3115612; fax: +1 505 3115612; e-mail: lblanco{at}unanleon.edu.ni

Objectives: Identification of pesticide exposure determinants has become an issue in explaining exposure variability and improving control measures. Most studies have been conducted in industrialized countries. The aim of this study was to identify relevant dermal exposure determinants among Nicaraguan subsistence farmers.

Methods: Field data on possible determinants were collected during 32 pesticide applications through observation and supplementary videorecording. A multistep reduction strategy brought down the 110 potential exposure determinants to 27 variables, which were grouped as worksite, spray equipment, working practices, clothing or hygiene practices related. Dermal exposure was quantified with a modification of Fenske's visual scoring method. Multivariate linear regression modeling within groups and across groups was performed.

Results: In the within-group analyses, work practices, spray equipment and worksite related determinants explained 52, 33 and 25% of the exposure variability, respectively. Clothing and hygiene practices were weaker determinants and did not always reduce the exposure. The final model included determinants from all groups except hygiene practices and explained 69% of the exposure variability. A less restricted model increased the explained variability to 75%. Several novel determinants were identified, including spraying on a muddy terrain, dew on plants, sealing the tank lid with a cloth and wiping sweat from the face.

Conclusions: This study showed that a combination of observation and visual scoring techniques can provide valuable information on determinants of pesticide exposure and affected body parts under developing country conditions. The results could be used to develop job-specific questionnaires and to design training and preventive programs.

Keywords: dermal exposure • developing countries • exposure assessment • exposure determinants • fluorescent tracer • pesticide • subsistence farmers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. Hagstrom, C. Lundholm, K. Eriksson, and I. Liljelind
Variability and Determinants of Wood Dust and Resin Acid Exposure during Wood Pellet Production: Measurement Strategies and Bias in Assessing Exposure-Response Relationships
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2008; 52(8): 685 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H. Kromhout, B. Van Wendel De Joode, and J. Van Hemmen
The Accuracy of DERM may be a Self-fulfilling DREAM
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2008; 52(8): 783 - 784.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
L. E. Blanco, A. Aragon, I. Lundberg, C. Wesseling, and G. Nise
The Determinants of Dermal Exposure Ranking Method (DERM): A Pesticide Exposure Assessment Approach for Developing Countries
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 535 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. SPEE
Occupational Hygiene in Africa
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 431 - 435.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. ARAGON, L. E. BLANCO, A. FUNEZ, C. RUEPERT, C. LIDEN, G. NISE, and C. WESSELING
Assessment of Dermal Pesticide Exposure with Fluorescent Tracer: A Modification of a Visual Scoring System for Developing Countries
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 75 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.