Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on May 17, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 393-403, 2004
© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press
Determinants of Isocyanate Exposures in Auto Body Repair and Refinishing Shops
1 Department of Work Environment, University of MassachusettsLowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA; 2 Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
Received 21 July 2003; in final form 18 November 2003; published online on 7 July 2003
As part of the Survey of Painters and Repairers of Auto bodies by Yale (SPRAY), the determinants of isocyanate exposure in auto body repair shops were evaluated. Measurements (n = 380) of hexamethylene diisocyanate-based monomer and polyisocyanate and isophorone diisocyanate-based polyisocyanate were collected from 33 auto body shops. The median total reactive isocyanate concentrations expressed as mass concentration of the NCO functional group were: 206 µg NCO/m3 for spray operations; 0.93 µg NCO/m3 for samples collected in the vicinity of spray operations done on the shop floor (near spray); 0.05 µg NCO/m3 for office or other shop areas adjacent to spray areas (workplace background); 0.17 µg NCO/m3 for paint mixing and gun cleaning operations (mixing); 0.27 µg NCO/m3 for sanding operations. Exposure determinants for the sample NCO mass load were identified using linear regression, tobit regression and logistic regression models. For spray samples in a spray booth the significant determinants were the number of milliliters of NCO applied, the gallons of clear coat used by the shop each month and the type of spray booth used (custom built crossdraft, prefabricated crossdraft or downdraft/semi-downdraft). For near spray (bystander) samples, outdoor temperature >65°F (18°C) and shop size >5000 feet2 (465 m2) were significant determinants of exposure levels. For workplace background samples the shop annual income was the most important determinant. For sanding samples, the shop annual income and outdoor temperature >65°F (18°C) were the most significant determinants. Identification of these key exposure determinants will be useful in targeting exposure evaluation and control efforts to reduce isocyanate exposures.
Keywords: auto body; exposure determinants; isocyanate; statistical modeling
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Flack, K. W. Fent, L. G. Trelles Gaines, J. M. Thomasen, S. Whittaker, L. M. Ball, and L. A. Nylander-French Quantitative Plasma Biomarker Analysis in HDI Exposure Assessment Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2010; 54(1): 41 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Fent, L. G. T. Gaines, J. M. Thomasen, S. L. Flack, K. Ding, A. H. Herring, S. G. Whittaker, and L. A. Nylander-French Quantification and Statistical Modeling--Part I: Breathing-Zone Concentrations of Monomeric and Polymeric 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2009; 53(7): 677 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, M. H. Stowe, D. Bello, J. Sparer, R. J. Gore, M. R. Cullen, C. A. Redlich, and S. R. Woskie Skin Exposure to Aliphatic Polyisocyanates in the Auto Body Repair and Refinishing Industry: III. A Personal Exposure Algorithm Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2009; 53(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bobeldijk, D. Karlsson, A. Pronk, J. Gonsalves, M. Hekman, D. Van De Lagemaat, L. Preller, D. Heederik, and G. Skarping Validation of Transferability of DBA Derivatization and LC-MS/MS Determination Method for Isocyanates via an Interlaboratory Comparison Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2008; 52(8): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bello, C. A. Redlich, M. H. Stowe, J. Sparer, S. R. Woskie, R. P. Streicher, H. D. Hosgood, and Y. Liu Skin Exposure to Aliphatic Polyisocyanates in the Auto Body Repair and Refinishing Industry: II. A Quantitative Assessment Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2008; 52(2): 117 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. LIU, D. BELLO, J. A. SPARER, M. H. STOWE, R. J. GORE, S. R. WOSKIE, M. R. CULLEN, and C. A. REDLICH Skin Exposure to Aliphatic Polyisocyanates in the Auto Body Repair and Refinishing Industry: A Qualitative Assessment Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2007; 51(5): 429 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. CREELY, G. W. HUGHSON, J. COCKER, and K. JONES Assessing Isocyanate Exposures in Polyurethane Industry Sectors Using Biological and Air Monitoring Methods Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2006; 50(6): 609 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. PRONK, E. TIELEMANS, G. SKARPING, I. BOBELDIJK, J. VAN HEMMEN, D. HEEDERIK, and L. PRELLER Inhalation Exposure to Isocyanates of Car Body Repair Shop Workers and Industrial Spray Painters Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
