Skip Navigation


Annals of Occupational Hygiene Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/3/237    most recent
meh017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRANSMAN, W.
Right arrow Articles by KROMHOUT, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FRANSMAN, W.
Right arrow Articles by KROMHOUT, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 237-244, 2004
© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Occupational Dermal Exposure to Cyclophosphamide in Dutch Hospitals: A Pilot Study

WOUTER FRANSMAN1, ROEL VERMEULEN1,2 and HANS KROMHOUT1,*

1 Environmental and Occupational Health Group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80176, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2 National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Rockville, MD, USA

Received 2 June 2003; in final form 27 October 2003; published online on 2 March 2004

Introduction: Several studies have shown that exposure to antineoplastic drugs can cause reproductive toxic effects as well as carcinogenic effects. Presence of these drugs in the urine of hospital personnel has been widely studied and some work has been done on exposure by inhalation. So far, assessment of dermal exposure to antineoplastic drugs has not been extensively studied. In this pilot study we assessed potential and actual dermal exposure for several common hospital tasks. Results were used to derive an optimal measurement strategy for a currently ongoing exposure survey. Methods: Dermal exposure to cyclophosphamide was determined in three Dutch hospitals during five tasks (preparation, decanting urine, washing the patient, removing bed sheets and cleaning the toilet) using pad samples on 10 body locations. In addition, protective medical gloves (worn during the performance of these activities) were collected to estimate potential exposure of the hands. Subsequently, hands were washed to measure actual exposure of the hands. Bulk samples (i.e. application and body fluids) were collected and possible contact surfaces were monitored to assess the amount of cyclophosphamide potentially available for exposure. Results: The results show that hospital personnel (i.e. pharmacy technicians and oncology nurses) are dermally exposed to cyclophosphamide during performance of their daily duties. Exposure occurred predominantly on the hands and sporadically on other body locations (i.e. forehead and forearms). Gloves used during preparation of cyclophosphamide were more contaminated than gloves used in other tasks, however, actual exposure of the hands (underneath the gloves) was highest during decanting of urine of treated patients. Glove samples correlated significantly with handwash samples (r = 0.57, P = 0.03, n = 15). The level of protection from gloves varied between tasks, being highest for gloves used during preparation (median = 98%) and lowest for gloves used during decanting urine (median = 19%). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that dermal exposure to cyclophosphamide is common among hospital personnel. The results showed that hands, forearms and forehead accounted for 87% of the cyclophosphamide total body exposure. Glove samples together with handwash samples enabled estimation of glove efficiency, which appeared to vary strongly between tasks observed.

Keywords: antineoplastic drugs; cleaning personnel; cyclophosphamide; dermal exposure; hospital; nurses; pharmacy technicians


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
W. FRANSMAN, S. PEELEN, S. HILHORST, N. ROELEVELD, D. Heederik, and H. KROMHOUT
A Pooled Analysis to Study Trends in Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs Among Nurses
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2007; 51(3): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Meijster, W Fransman, J van Hemmen, H Kromhout, D Heederik, and E Tielemans
A probabilistic assessment of the impact of interventions on oncology nurses' exposure to antineoplastic agents
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2006; 63(8): 530 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H. MARQUART, N. D. WARREN, J. LAITINEN, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Default Values for Assessment of Potential Dermal Exposure of the Hands to Industrial Chemicals in the Scope of Regulatory Risk Assessments
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 469 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
N. D. WARREN, H. MARQUART, Y. CHRISTOPHER, J. LAITINEN, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Task-based Dermal Exposure Models for Regulatory Risk Assessment
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 491 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H. J. MASON, S. BLAIR, C. SAMS, K. JONES, S. J. GARFITT, M. J. CUSCHIERI, and P. J. BAXTER
Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Two UK Hospital Pharmacy Units
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2005; 49(7): 603 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. CRAUSTE-MANCIET, P. J. M. SESSINK, S. FERRARI, J.-Y. JOMIER, and D. BROSSARD
Environmental Contamination with Cytotoxic Drugs in Healthcare Using Positive Air Pressure Isolators
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2005; 49(7): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B van Wendel de Joode, R Vermeulen, J J van Hemmen, W Fransman, and H Kromhout
Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM)
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2005; 62(9): 623 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
T. H. Connor, P. J. M. Sessink, B. R. Harrison, J. R. Pretty, B. G. Peters, R. M. Alfaro, A. Bilos, G. Beckmann, M. R. Bing, L. M. Anderson, et al.
Surface contamination of chemotherapy drug vials and evaluation of new vial-cleaning techniques: Results of three studies
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2005; 62(5): 475 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
R. RAJAN-SITHAMPARANADARAJAH, M. ROFF, P. DELGADO, K. ERIKSSON, W. FRANSMAN, J. H. J. GIJSBERS, G. HUGHSON, M. MAKINEN, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Patterns of Dermal Exposure to Hazardous Substances in European Union Workplaces
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2004; 48(3): 285 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.