Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURGESS, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by CHERRY, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BURGESS, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by CHERRY, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 117-127, 2004
© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Retrospective Noise Estimates for British Nuclear Workers Using an Alternative Approach

GARY L. BURGESS1,*, W. MARTIN DIPPNALL1, M. REZA G. RAVANDI1 and NICOLA M. CHERRY2

1 Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Humanities Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 13-103 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton T6G 2G3, Canada

Received 1 August 2002; in final form 15 August 2003

Exposure estimates were required to support an epidemiological study of occupational noise and cardiovascular disease. The study cohort consisted of male industrial workers employed at two nuclear facilities in England between 1945 and 1999 (n = 2412). Historical noise exposure data were available from 6850 sound pressure measurements collected since 1965. Additional information was obtained from interviews with retired and long-term company personnel. Partly due to the lack of information provided by job title, coupled with the fact that noise behaves differently compared with chemical agents, an unusual approach was used to estimate noise exposure. Rather than grouping homogeneous exposure groups by job title or task, the assessors first used historical sampling data to estimate average area noise levels in each workplace where a survey had been performed. Noise contours were then estimated in the work area and, finally, individual estimates of exposure were further refined based on job title. Estimates were extrapolated to areas where noise surveys were not performed and adjustments were made for potential bias. Overall, noise exposure estimates ranged from 60 to 97 dBA, with a median of 86 dBA. For use in subsequent exposure–response analysis, cohort work histories were used to calculate exposure indices of cumulative, average intensity and exposure duration above 85 dBA. Validation exercises are discussed.

Keywords: job exposure matrix; noise; retrospective exposure assessment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
H W Davies, K Teschke, S M Kennedy, M R Hodgson, and P A Demers
A retrospective assessment of occupational noise exposures for a longitudinal epidemiological study
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2009; 66(6): 388 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
R McNamee, G Burgess, W M Dippnall, and N Cherry
Predictive validity of a retrospective measure of noise exposure
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2006; 63(12): 808 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
R McNamee, G Burgess, W M Dippnall, and N Cherry
Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2006; 63(12): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.