Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UTER, W.
Right arrow Articles by GEFELLER, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by UTER, W.
Right arrow Articles by GEFELLER, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 21-27, 2004
© 2004 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Contact Allergy in Construction Workers: Results of a Multifactorial Analysis

WOLFGANG UTER1,*, REINHOLD RÜHL2, ANNETTE PFAHLBERG1, JOHANNES GEIER3, AXEL SCHNUCH3 and OLAF GEFELLER1

1 Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen; 2 Bau-Berufsgenossenschaft Frankfurt am Main, An der Festeburg 27–29, 60389 Frankfurt/Main; 3 Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Department of Dermatology, Georg-August University Göttingen, von-Siebold-Strasse 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

Received 21 March 2003; in final form 9 June 2003

Objectives: To quantify the risk of contact allergy (CA) to important ubiquitous allergens associated with certain occupations, in particular the construction industry, and to identify possible time trends, controlling for potential confounding variables. Methods: Bivariate as well as Poisson regression analysis of standardized anamnestic and patch test data comprising 82 561 patients assessed in the 33 German and Austrian contact dermatitis units of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 1992 and 2000. Results: CA to five of the 18 (groups of) allergens considered here were observed significantly more often in construction workers: dichromate, epoxy resin (BADGE), cobalt, thiurams and N-isopropyl-p-phenylenediamine (IPPD). Multifactorial analysis confirmed an increased risk of CA to these allergens in construction workers, compared with other occupations. A very strong association between cobalt and chromate allergy was found in construction workers (OR 39.1, 95% CI 21.1–79.6). Conclusions: Dichromate is still an prominent allergen in construction workers; as yet, there is only weak evidence of a decrease in Germany. Therefore, the addition of ferrous sulphate to cement, which has been a successful intervention in other countries, should be promoted further. Although CA to other important occupational allergens like thiurams, IPPD and epoxy resin or cobalt (very often associated with dichromate CA) is less frequent, prevention should address these allergens, too. The use of protective gloves with minimal intrinsic CA risk, e.g. due to thiurams in (synthetic) rubber or chromate in leather gloves, should be promoted.

Keywords: contact allergy; construction industry; chromate; cobalt; epoxy resin; clinical epidemiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. OGDEN
Annals of Occupational Hygiene at Volume 50: Many Achievements, a Few Mistakes, and an Interesting Future
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2006; 50(8): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.