Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Camus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. suppl_1, pp. 95-98, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Risk of Mesothelioma Among Women Living Near Chrysotile Mines Versus US EPA Asbestos Risk Model: Preliminary Findings

M. Camus1,*, J. Siemiatycki2, B. W. Case2,3 and S. Campbell2

1 Science Affairs and Statistics Division, Health Canada 10881 rue Durham Montréal, Québec H2C 2G8
2 INRS–Institut Armand-Frappier 531 boulevard des Prairies, Laval, Québec H7V 1B7
3 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University and Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital 3775 University Street, Montreal, Québec H3A 2B4, Canada

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Introduction. The risk of asbestos diseases cannot be measured directly in populations with low level chrysotile asbestos exposure. Risk assessments must be used to extrapolate risks from past heavy industrial asbestos exposures to today's low chrysotile exposures. We tested the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mesothelioma risk model in a population having experienced relatively high and mostly non-occupational chrysotile exposures.

Methods. Female mesotheliomas first diagnosed from 1970 to 1989 in chrysotile asbestos mining districts (Asbestos and Thetford) were identified from the Quebec Tumour Registry and hospital records gathered throughout the province. Diagnoses were reviewed by three pathologists. An international expert panel estimated historical ambient exposure levels in these districts. A ‘time–area–job–family exposure’ matrix was derived from these estimates, occupational and cohabitation exposure estimates and a survey of 817 female residents. We applied the EPA mesothelioma incidence model to the population time–area–job–family exposure matrix and compared this predicted incidence with that actually observed.

Results. Ambient airborne asbestos exposures were between 0.1 and 3 fibres/ml before 1970. The EPA asbestos risk model predicted 150 (range 30–750) female mesotheliomas in Asbestos, while only one case (peritoneal) was observed; 500 cases (range 100–2500) were predicted in Thetford Mines, while 10 cases (pleural) were observed. These large discrepancies cannot be explained by random or systematic errors.

amphibole • asbestos • chrysotile • cohabitation • linear carcinogenesis model • mesothelioma • neighbourhood • occupational exposure • risk assessment • tremolite


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.