Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steenland, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mannejte, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steenland, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mannejte, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. suppl_1, pp. 4-9, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Pooled Analyses of Renal Disease Mortality and Crystalline Silica Exposure in Three Cohorts

Kyle Steenland1,*, Mike Attfield2 and Andrea Mannejte3

1 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control NIOSH R13, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA
2 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control Morgantown, WV, USA
3 International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, France

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Respirable crystalline silica exposure has been associated with renal disease in recent literature. Approximately 2000000 people are occupationally exposed to silica in the USA, 100000 at more than twice the NIOSH recommended exposure limit of 0.05 mg/m3. We have examined renal disease mortality in three silica-exposed cohorts totaling 13382 workers; 51 died with renal disease (ICD codes 580–587, 9th revision) as the underlying cause and 153 others had renal disease as a contributory cause on their death certificates. All three of these cohorts had job–exposure matrices that enabled estimation of exposure over time; all three also had data on multiple cause mortality, particularly desirable for kidney disease, which may not be the underlying cause of death. Results from two cohorts have been published previously; follow-up for one has been extended by 6 yr. Using both underlying cause and contributory analyses (multiple cause), we compared renal disease in these cohorts with the US population and also conducted exposure–response analyses. We found excess mortality from renal disease [standard mortality ratio (SMR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.85] as the underlying cause and also using multiple cause analysis (SMR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10–1.47). Exposure–response analyses showed a monotonic increase in renal disease mortality with increasing exposure. Odds ratios by quartile of cumulative exposure were 1.00, 1.24, 1.77 and 2.86 (P = 0.0002) for multiple cause analyses and 1.00, 1.88, 1.96 and 3.93 (P = 0.03) for underlying cause analysis. Pooled analyses provide large sample sizes; these data represent the largest number of renal disease deaths analyzed to date in workers with well defined silica exposure and suggest a causal link between occupational exposure to silica and renal disease. Excess risk of death from renal disease (underlying cause) by age 75 due to a lifetime of occupational exposure at 0.1 mg/m3 (the OSHA standard when respirable dust is 100% silica) is estimated to be 1.8% (95% CI 0.8–9.7%), above a background risk of 0.3%.

renal disease • silica


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.