Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Colby, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Colby, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. suppl_1, pp. 110-114, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Does Fiber Glass Pose a Respiratory System Cancer Risk in Humans? Latest Findings from the US Cohort and Nested Case-Control Studies

Gary M. Marsh1,*, Ada O. Youk1, Roslyn A. Stone1, Jeanine M. Buchanich1, Mary Jean Gula1, Thomas J. Smith2, Andrew Churg3 and Thomas Colby4

1 Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
2 Occupational Health Program, Harvard School of Public Health 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3 Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia 2211 Wesbrook, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 1B7
4 Department of Surgical Pathology, Mayo Clinic 13400 East Shea, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1-412-624-3032; fax: +1-412-624-9969; e-mail: gmarsh{at}pitt.edu

We report findings to date from our 1992 follow-up of the US fiber glass (FG) worker cohort, which includes 32110 workers from 10 study plants. Key findings include: (i) in all but one study plant, a higher prevalence of ‘ever’ cigarette smoking among male FG workers compared to the US and respective state populations; (ii) cigarette smoking strongly predicts respiratory system cancer (RSC) risk, strongly confounds the comparison of RSC risk between FG workers and the general population, and weakly confounds the exposure–response relationship between respirable fiber (RFib) and RSC; (iii) an overall 7% local county rate-based mortality excess for RSC among male workers appears to be entirely explained by positive confounding by smoking; (iv) the overall risk of mesothelioma does not appear to be elevated; (v) RSC risk does not increase with increasing levels of the categorical (weighted or unweighted) or quantitative (unweighted) RFib exposure measures considered; and (vi) with the possible exception of formaldehyde and silica, no positive associations were identified between RSC risk and any of the other co-exposures considered. Our findings to date from external comparisons in the cohort study and internal comparisons in the case-control study suggest that exposure to RFib at the levels encountered in the study plants is not associated with an increased risk of RSC or mesothelioma. These findings are generally similar to our previous 1985 follow-up of the original FG cohort, and to those other cohort studies of FG production workers conducted in the US, Canada and Europe. Ongoing or planned analyses include plant-specific analyses and will consider small diameter, special-application glass fibers and possibly more sensitive measuresof fiber exposure that account for such features as biopersistence and solubility.

man-made vitreous fibers • fiber glass • rock wool • slag wool • cohort study • case-control study • occupational diseases • lung cancer • mesothelioma • formaldehyde • silica • cigarette smoking • confounding bias


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.