Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. suppl_1, pp. 102-104, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press
Subchronic Studies on Man-Made Vitreous Fibres: Toxicity Results
1 Toxicology Services Uppingham UK
2 Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Aerosol Research Nickolai-Fuchs Strasse 1, Hannover, Germany
3 CREE, Rue Jean Monet Zac du Min BP 224 84306, Cedex Cavaillon, France
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: RB{at}toxservices.demon.co.uk
Two alkaline earth silicate wools—a calcium magnesium silicate and a calcium magnesium zirconium silicate—were examined in a subchronic 90-day rat inhalation assay. A preparation of a high-purity refractory ceramic fibre (RCF), a non-fibrous particulate (NFP) with the same, aluminosilicate chemical composition and a sample of long-fibred amosite were also examined. The assay was similar to that proposed by the European Union but was undertaken before that protocol was finalized. Exposure was to a single fibre concentration only (150 fibres >20 µm long/ml); NFP was used at an equal mass aerosol concentration to that of the RCF. The rats were followed for 1 yr after exposure. Neither of the alkaline earth silicates accumulated in the lung to a sufficient level to cause any significant effect. The non-fibrous particulate produced more inflammation than any of the fibres. All inflammatory effects were proportional to the inhibition of macrophage-mediated particle clearance. As the amosite fibres are thin, this material accumulated to lower mass burden than the man-made fibres. Compared with the man-made fibres, amosite caused less inflammation but more cell proliferation.
subchronic inhalation man-made fibres amosite fibre clearance non-fibrous particles
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. BROWN, B. BELLMANN, H. MUHLE, J. M. G. DAVIS, and L. D. MAXIM Survey of the Biological Effects of Refractory Ceramic Fibres: Overload and Its Possible Consequences Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2005; 49(4): 295 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
