Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MIKKELSEN, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by SCHAUMBURG, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MIKKELSEN, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by SCHAUMBURG, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 673-685, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Determinants of Wood Dust Exposure in the Danish Furniture Industry

ANDERS B. MIKKELSEN1,*, VIVI SCHLÜNSSEN1, TORBEN SIGSGAARD2 and INGER SCHAUMBURG1

1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Skive Hospital, Resenvej 25, DK-7800 Skive; 2 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Received 24 December 2001; in final form 29 June 2002

This paper investigates the relation between wood dust exposure in the furniture industry and occupational hygiene variables. During the winter 1997–98 54 factories were visited and 2362 personal, passive inhalable dust samples were obtained; the geometric mean was 0.95 mg/m3 and the geometric standard deviation was 2.08. In a first measuring round 1685 dust concentrations were obtained. For some of the workers repeated measurements were carried out 1 (351) and 2 weeks (326) after the first measurement. Hygiene variables like job, exhaust ventilation, cleaning procedures, etc., were documented. A multivariate analysis based on mixed effects models was used with hygiene variables being fixed effects and worker, machine, department and factory being random effects. A modified stepwise strategy of model making was adopted taking into account the hierarchically structured variables and making possible the exclusion of non-influential random as well as fixed effects. For woodworking, the following determinants of exposure increase the dust concentration: manual and automatic sanding and use of compressed air with fully automatic and semi-automatic machines and for cleaning of work pieces. Decreased dust exposure resulted from the use of compressed air with manual machines, working at fully automatic or semi-automatic machines, functioning exhaust ventilation, work on the night shift, daily cleaning of rooms, cleaning of work pieces with a brush, vacuum cleaning of machines, supplementary fresh air intake and safety representative elected within the last 2 yr. For handling and assembling, increased exposure results from work at automatic machines and presence of wood dust on the workpieces. Work on the evening shift, supplementary fresh air intake, work in a chair factory and special cleaning staff produced decreased exposure to wood dust. The implications of the results for the prevention of wood dust exposure are discussed.

Keywords: exposure determinants; furniture industry; inhalable dust; mixed effects model; preventive measures; wood dust


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Galea, M. Van Tongeren, A. J. Sleeuwenhoek, D. While, M. Graham, A. Bolton, H. Kromhout, and J. W. Cherrie
Trends in Wood Dust Inhalation Exposure in the UK, 1985-2005
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2009; 53(7): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H. Sbihi, K. Teschke, Y. C. Macnab, and H. W. Davies
Determinants of Use of Hearing Protection Devices in Canadian Lumber Mill Workers
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2009; (2009) mep043v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. Meijster, E. Tielemans, J. Schinkel, and D. Heederik
Evaluation of Peak Exposures in the Dutch Flour Processing Industry: Implications for Intervention Strategies
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 587 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A Scarselli, A Binazzi, P Ferrante, and A Marinaccio
Occupational exposure levels to wood dust in Italy, 1996-2006
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2008; 65(8): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
V. Schlunssen, G. Jacobsen, M. Erlandsen, A. B. Mikkelsen, I. Schaumburg, and T. Sigsgaard
Determinants of Wood Dust Exposure in the Danish Furniture Industry--Results from Two Cross-Sectional Studies 6 Years Apart
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2008; 52(4): 227 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
T. SPEE, E. V. D. R.-V. HOOF, W. V. HOOF, D. NOY, and H. KROMHOUT
Exposure to Wood Dust Among Carpenters in the Construction Industry in The Netherlands
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2007; 51(3): 241 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
N. BLACK, M. DILWORTH, and N. SUMMERS
Occupational Exposure to Wood Dust in the British Woodworking Industry in 1999/2000
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2007; 51(3): 249 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. C. FRIESEN, Y. C. MACNAB, S. A. MARION, P. A. DEMERS, H. W. DAVIES, and K. TESCHKE
Mixed Models and Empirical Bayes Estimation for Retrospective Exposure Assessment of Dust Exposures in Canadian Sawmills
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2006; 50(3): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
V Schlunssen, T Sigsgaard, I Schaumburg, and H Kromhout
Cross-shift changes in FEV1 in relation to wood dust exposure: the implications of different exposure assessment methods
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2004; 61(10): 824 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.