Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 549-554, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press
Measurement Strategies for the Determination of Airborne Bacterial Endotoxin in Sewage Treatment Plants
Department of Environmental Medicine, Göteborg University, Box 414, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
Received 30 November 2001; in final form 28 March 2002
Working in sewage plants can involve exposure to different types of microorganisms, viruses and chemicals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different measurement strategies to determine airborne bacterial endotoxin in such plants. Sewage treatment plants in three municipalities in western Sweden were included. Measurements of airborne endotoxin were performed in AprilMay and SeptemberOctober 2001 using personal and stationary samplers. The air sampling times ranged from 60 to 444 min. In stationary and personal sampler measurements, the amounts of airborne endotoxin detected were generally low. At specific worksites, however, higher endotoxin values were identified, with the highest values at worksites located indoors. The results suggest that the exposure situation is relatively stable over a short time period at a specific worksite and that higher values can be recorded during work practices where agitation of wastewater occurs. The results further suggest that airborne endotoxin exposure situations in sewage treatment plants are complex. Sampling techniques, indoor/outdoor measurements and identification of specific worksites/tasks where there is a risk of airborne endotoxin exposure are important factors that must be considered in order to obtain relevant exposure determinations and establish preventive measures from a health risk perspective.
Keywords: endotoxin, sampling technique, sewage water
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. VISSER, S. SPAAN, H. J. J. M. ARTS, L. A. M. SMIT, and D. J. J. HEEDERIK Influence of Different Cleaning Practices on Endotoxin Exposure at Sewage Treatment Plants Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2006; 50(7): 731 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. OPPLIGER, S. HILFIKER, and T. VU DUC Influence of Seasons and Sampling Strategy on Assessment of Bioaerosols in Sewage Treatment Plants in Switzerland Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2005; 49(5): 393 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. O. BREUM, T. SCHNEIDER, O. JORGENSEN, T. VALDBJORN RASMUSSEN, and S. SKIBSTRUP ERIKSEN Cellulosic Building Insulation versus Mineral Wool, Fiberglass or Perlite: Installer's Exposure by Inhalation of Fibers, Dust, Endotoxin and Fire-retardant Additives Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2003; 47(8): 653 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lange, U. Fedeli, G. Mastrangelo, H. Tanaka, T. Saikai, and S. Abe Is Mushroom Workers' Chronic Cough the Same as Byssinosis and What Should the Occupational Exposure Limit Be for Endotoxin? Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 2160 - 2162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Niehaus and J H Lange Endotoxin: is it an environmental factor in the cause of Parkinson's disease? Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2003; 60(5): 378 - 378. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rylander Review: Endotoxin in the environment -- exposure and effects Innate Immunity, August 1, 2002; 8(4): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



