Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAYNARD, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MAYNARD, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 511-522, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Thoracic Size-selection of Fibres: Dependence of Penetration on Fibre Length for Five Thoracic Sampler Types

ANDREW D. MAYNARD*

Health and Safety Laboratory, Health & Safety Executive, Broad Lane, Sheffield S3 7HQ, UK

Received 1 October 2001; in final form 7 February 2002

It has been suggested that the non-size-selective sampling methods currently used for fibrous aerosols potentially lead to the presence of large compact particles, agglomerates and fibre clumps in samples, which in turn reduce the accuracy and precision of the manual fibre counting techniques employed to analyse samples. The use of thoracic size-selective samplers has been proposed as an alternative, leading to the prevention of large particles reaching the collection substrate while at the same time bringing fibre sampling into line with general occupational aerosol sampling methodologies. Thoracic samplers should give good agreement with current sampling methods under ideal conditions based on aerodynamic fibre properties. However, the effect of fibre length on sampling efficiency is not known. The sampling efficiency of five thoracic samplers was therefore measured as a function of fibre length for respirable fibres between 10 and 60 µm long. These included the commercially available GK2.69 cyclone and the CATHIA sampler, the IOM thoracic sampler, a modified version of the SIMPEDS cyclone and a modified version of the IOM inhalable sampler. Length-monodisperse fibres were generated using a dielectrophoretic fibre classifier and sampler penetration was measured as a function of fibre length. No length-dependent sampling effects were observed for the CATHIA, GK2.69, modified SIMPEDS and modified IOM inhalable samplers for fibres <60 µm. Data for the IOM thoracic sampler showed a significant trend of reducing sampling efficiency for fibres >30 µm. Overall, the laboratory results indicated that the five sampler types are likely to perform as well as or better than the currently used 25 mm cowled sampler in the field.

Keywords: fibre; size-selective aerosol sampling; sampler penetration; fibre length classification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. G. Lee, M. Harper, J. Nelson, P. J. Hintz, and M. E. Andrew
A Comparison of the CATHIA-T Sampler, the GK2.69 Cyclone and the Standard Cowled Sampler for Thoracic Fiber Concentrations at a Taconite (Iron Ore)-Processing Mill
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2008; 52(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. D. JONES, R. J. AITKEN, J. F. FABRIES, E. KAUFFER, G. LIDEN, A. MAYNARD, G. RIEDIGER, and W. SAHLE
Thoracic Size-Selective Sampling of Fibres: Performance of Four Types of Thoracic Sampler in Laboratory Tests
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2005; 49(6): 481 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.