Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EGEGHY, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by RAPPAPORT, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EGEGHY, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by RAPPAPORT, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 489-500, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Self-collected Breath Sampling for Monitoring Low-level Benzene Exposures among Automobile Mechanics

PETER P. EGEGHY, LEENA NYLANDER-FRENCH, KRISTIN K. GWIN, IRVA HERTZ-PICCIOTTO and STEPHEN M. RAPPAPORT*

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA

Received 29 June 2001; in final form 14 January 2002

Automobile mechanics are exposed to benzene through their contact with gasoline vapor and engine exhaust. This study investigated the benzene uptake associated with these exposures. We first evaluated the reliability of self-collected breath samples among a subset of subjects and found good agreement between these samples and those collected under expert supervision (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.79, n = 69). We then used self-monitoring together with a longitudinal sampling design (with up to three measurements per worker) to measure benzene in air and benzene in end-exhaled breath among 81 workers from 12 automobile repair garages in North Carolina. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney rank sum test) was observed between non-smokers and smokers for post-exposure benzene concentration in breath (median values of 18.9 and 39.1 µg/m3, respectively). Comparing pre- and post-exposure breath concentrations within these two groups, the difference was significant among non-smokers (P < 0.0001) but not significant among smokers (P > 0.05). Mixed effects regression analysis using backwards elimination yielded five significant predictors of benzene concentration in breath, namely benzene exposure (P < 0.0001), pre-exposure benzene concentration in breath (P = 0.021), smoking status (P < 0.0001), fuel system work (P = 0.0043) and carburetor cleaner use (P < 0.0001). The between-person variance component comprised only 28% of the total variance in benzene levels in breath, indicating that differences among individuals related to physiological and metabolic characteristics had little influence on benzene uptake among these workers.

Keywords: benzene; gasoline; biological monitoring; self-monitoring; exhaled air; breath analysis; mixed models; automobile mechanics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
G. Ramachandran
Toward Better Exposure Assessment Strategies--The New NIOSH Initiative
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2008; 52(5): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. HERTSENBERG, D. BROUWER, M. LURVINK, C. RUBINGH, E. RIJNDERS, and E. TIELEMANS
Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents Among Shoe Repair Men
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. SYMANSKI, S. MABERTI, and W. CHAN
A Meta-Analytic Approach for Characterizing the Within-Worker and Between-Worker Sources of Variation in Occupational Exposure
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2006; 50(4): 343 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
Y S Lin, L L Kupper, and S M Rappaport
Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2005; 62(11): 750 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. LAVOUE, C. BEAUDRY, N. GOYER, G. PERRAULT, and M. GERIN
Investigation of Determinants of Past and Current Exposures to Formaldehyde in the Reconstituted Wood Panel Industry in Quebec
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2005; 49(7): 587 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. F. PERIAGO and C. PRADO
Evolution of Occupational Exposure to Environmental Levels of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Service Stations
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2005; 49(3): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P P Egeghy, L Hauf-Cabalo, R Gibson, and S M Rappaport
Benzene and naphthalene in air and breath as indicators of exposure to jet fuel
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2003; 60(12): 969 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
I Liljelind, S Rappaport, K Eriksson, J Andersson, I A Bergdahl, A-L Sunesson, and B Jarvholm
Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2003; 60(8): 599 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.