Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 489-500, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press
Self-collected Breath Sampling for Monitoring Low-level Benzene Exposures among Automobile Mechanics
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA
Received 29 June 2001; in final form 14 January 2002
Automobile mechanics are exposed to benzene through their contact with gasoline vapor and engine exhaust. This study investigated the benzene uptake associated with these exposures. We first evaluated the reliability of self-collected breath samples among a subset of subjects and found good agreement between these samples and those collected under expert supervision (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.79, n = 69). We then used self-monitoring together with a longitudinal sampling design (with up to three measurements per worker) to measure benzene in air and benzene in end-exhaled breath among 81 workers from 12 automobile repair garages in North Carolina. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001, MannWhitney rank sum test) was observed between non-smokers and smokers for post-exposure benzene concentration in breath (median values of 18.9 and 39.1 µg/m3, respectively). Comparing pre- and post-exposure breath concentrations within these two groups, the difference was significant among non-smokers (P < 0.0001) but not significant among smokers (P > 0.05). Mixed effects regression analysis using backwards elimination yielded five significant predictors of benzene concentration in breath, namely benzene exposure (P < 0.0001), pre-exposure benzene concentration in breath (P = 0.021), smoking status (P < 0.0001), fuel system work (P = 0.0043) and carburetor cleaner use (P < 0.0001). The between-person variance component comprised only 28% of the total variance in benzene levels in breath, indicating that differences among individuals related to physiological and metabolic characteristics had little influence on benzene uptake among these workers.
Keywords: benzene; gasoline; biological monitoring; self-monitoring; exhaled air; breath analysis; mixed models; automobile mechanics
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Ramachandran Toward Better Exposure Assessment Strategies--The New NIOSH Initiative Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2008; 52(5): 297 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. HERTSENBERG, D. BROUWER, M. LURVINK, C. RUBINGH, E. RIJNDERS, and E. TIELEMANS Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents Among Shoe Repair Men Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 45 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. SYMANSKI, S. MABERTI, and W. CHAN A Meta-Analytic Approach for Characterizing the Within-Worker and Between-Worker Sources of Variation in Occupational Exposure Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2006; 50(4): 343 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y S Lin, L L Kupper, and S M Rappaport Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2005; 62(11): 750 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. LAVOUE, C. BEAUDRY, N. GOYER, G. PERRAULT, and M. GERIN Investigation of Determinants of Past and Current Exposures to Formaldehyde in the Reconstituted Wood Panel Industry in Quebec Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2005; 49(7): 587 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. PERIAGO and C. PRADO Evolution of Occupational Exposure to Environmental Levels of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Service Stations Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2005; 49(3): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P P Egeghy, L Hauf-Cabalo, R Gibson, and S M Rappaport Benzene and naphthalene in air and breath as indicators of exposure to jet fuel Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2003; 60(12): 969 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Liljelind, S Rappaport, K Eriksson, J Andersson, I A Bergdahl, A-L Sunesson, and B Jarvholm Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2003; 60(8): 599 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

