Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ADDISON, N.
Right arrow Articles by BURGESS, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ADDISON, N.
Right arrow Articles by BURGESS, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 149-155, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Article

Compliance with the Manual Handling Regulations amongst a Random Selection of Small Businesses in England

NIGEL ADDISON1 and GARY BURGESS2,*

1Royal Mail, Employee Health Services, 2 Station Road, Chester CH1 3AA; 2University of Manchester, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Received 23 March 2001; in final form 3 August 2001.

Manual handling activities have long been recognized as major contributors to occupational injury and ill health. Following a series of consultative documents, the Manual Handling Operations Regulations (MHORs) and their associated Guidance came into force in the UK in January 1993. More than 5 yr on, an investigation was performed to evaluate response to this legislation amongst a random selection of small businesses within a business district of Shropshire, England. A postal questionnaire was sent to 100 companies employing 5–50 workers. Responses were obtained from 80 companies, ranging from retailing to metals/engineering. Although all of the companies are likely to perform activities requiring manual handling assessments under the MHORs, many claimed never to have heard of the legislation (38%) and almost half (46%) had not performed an assessment. Compliance varied significantly by business type, with the nine companies engaged in metals/engineering reporting significantly better compliance (P < 0.05). Of the 43 companies who claimed to have undertaken assessments, 73% (32 companies) indicated that manual handling activities had been changed, with all claiming to have reduced lifting activities, a significant proportion (75%) making improvements to the working environment and over half (59%) reducing the weight of loads. Many of the companies who indicated full compliance with the legislation (21 companies) stated that the benefits to their businesses outweighed the cost of compliance. Additional factors analysed by the study include source of legislative awareness, personnel performing assessments, employee training and method used, and reasons for non-compliance with the MHORs.

Keywords: manual handling; small business; SMEs; legislation; compliance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.